ServiceNow
ServiceNow sells large companies and governments one cloud system for handling their internal requests, from a broken laptop to a new hire, and increasingly the AI agents that answer them.
The scores
Growth4/4 →
Revenue grew 21% to 24% a year from 2023 to 2025; 2026 is guided to 21% at constant currency, about 2 points bought.
Business quality3/4 →
Customers renew 98% and large ones keep growing, but Salesforce and Microsoft agents attack the desk, and AI's effect on users is untested.
Financial position3/4 ↓
Net debt of about $0.9B against $5.3B of yearly operating cash, but $2.1B of commercial paper rolls every few months.
Execution record3/4 →
Beat every quarterly guide, but cut 2026 margin guides twice and spent $11B on deals in six months; 4 if the deals pay.
Per share capture2/4 →
Stock pay takes about half of free cash flow and buybacks only hold the count flat; 3 if stock pay falls toward 10%.
Potential3/4 →
$29.0B is contracted, and the 2030 plan needs about 18% a year in a market Gartner sees growing 15%; each step shows quarterly.
Risk profile3/4 ↓
One federal partner is 13% of revenue and rising, with an open Justice Department investigation; survivable.
Valuation2/4 ↑
About 46 times 2026 cash after stock pay implies about 7% growth for ever: the 2030 plan landing. 3 if stock pay falls as pledged.
Evidence quality3/4 →
Results, renewals and contracts are filed; users, AI contract value and the 2030 plan are management's word only.
The Verdict
We rate ServiceNow Neutral. It is a solid business: customers renew 98% of their contracts and sales are guided to grow about 21% this year. The price is full: counting pay in shares as the cost it is, buyers pay about 46 times the cash this year should produce, which only makes sense if the company hits its 2030 plan. The view hinges on one question nobody can yet answer from the filings: whether AI agents that do support staff's work will shrink the number of users customers pay ServiceNow for.
The long caseCompanies keep running more of their work through one system that routes requests to people and AI agents, and ServiceNow's record stays that system.
The evidence under this - 7 claims
- In April the guide outside Armis was held, not raised, and the shares fell 17.7% the next day (S08, S14).
- Each margin in the guide was cut by half a point to a point between January and July (S03, S05).
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35): Q3 beat the guide, free cash flow margin guide raised by one point to 36%, Q4 guide set.
- If the 2030 plan lands, about $30B of subscription revenue at a Rule of 60 margin with stock pay under 10% gives roughly $10B of cash after stock pay, so today's price is about 14 times 2030 (C13).
- Net debt of about $0.9B is ignored here; adding it moves the multiple by under 1% (C09).
A $30B 2030 needs about 18% a year from the $15.8B 2026 guide while cRPO growth is slowing toward 19.5% with acquisitions inside it (C06).
- Management says active users grew 25% and seats are rising, and half of new business is no longer priced per user (C15, C12).
- Renewals have held at 98% through 2026, and no customer has been reported cutting ServiceNow seats because of AI (C05).
No user or seat count appears in any filing, and the renewal rate leaves out changes in users, so the claim cannot be checked (S01).
The company
Every large organisation has a stream of internal requests: a laptop breaks, someone joins, a supplier needs approving, a customer complains, a security alert fires. ServiceNow's cloud system logs each request, sends it to the right person or AI agent, and records the fix, on one shared map of the company's devices and staff.
Its buyers are big companies and governments; US agencies certified it for their highest security tier in 2019. Without it they would run older help-desk software and separate tools that do not share data.
The evidence under this - 3 claims
How it makes money
Almost all the money is subscriptions. In 2025 customers paid $12.88B of $13.28B of revenue for the software, usually on three-year contracts, so most of each year's sales were signed before it began.
It has charged mostly by the user, the staff who work the requests. Management says half of new business is now priced by usage or by AI packs instead, and that its AI editions cost customers 30% more.
The evidence under this - 3 claims
The AI figure counts only the extra price of AI editions, its label changed from Now Assist to ServiceNow AI this year, and none of it appears in a filing (S04, S08).
Where the money comes from, stream by stream
| Stream | Share of sales (FY 2025) | How it earns it |
|---|---|---|
| Hosted subscriptions | 93.3% | Yearly fees for the workflow software, AI editions and usage packs, run in ServiceNow's or a public cloud's data centres and booked over the contract. |
| Self-hosted subscriptions | 3.7% | Subscriptions customers, mostly governments, run on their own servers, part of which is booked up front. |
| Professional services and other | 3.0% | Implementation and training, run at a loss. |
Who runs it
Bill McDermott, formerly SAP's chief executive, has run ServiceNow since 2019 and agreed to stay through 2030. Directors and officers own about 0.34% of the shares, mostly options.
Their bonus pays mainly on new contract value and long-term awards on 2027 subscription sales, nothing on cash after pay in shares. In February 2026 five executives cancelled planned share sales and McDermott bought $3M of stock, his first purchase since 2019.
The evidence under this - 4 claims
No headcount appears in either 2026 10-Q, and severance costs of $80M in the first half are the only filed sign of cuts (S02).
Why it wins, and who could beat it
Why customers come back
Leaving is hard. A company builds years of its own rules, forms and links to other systems on ServiceNow, and its staff are trained on it; a government agency would also have to win security approval for a replacement. So customers renewed 98% of contracts in each of the last three years.
What it does is worth a lot to the buyer. The government counts 750,600 US support specialists whose work it routes, and ServiceNow says its agent closes in minutes cases that take a person two days.
The evidence under this - 5 claims
These are the seller's figures from unnamed customers, and the product is priced partly on usage, so its value to ServiceNow is not filed (S01).
The threat
Rivals are attacking the core service desk with AI. Salesforce says 180 organisations chose its new IT desk in four months, one of them replacing ServiceNow. Microsoft is building agents into licences companies already own, and Freshworks and start-ups like Serval sell cheaper desks.
The deeper worry is that agents do the support staff's work, so customers need fewer of the users ServiceNow charges for.
The evidence under this - 5 claims
Selected is not contracted, no value is given, the product appears in no Salesforce filing, and CoolSys is a private services firm (S23, S20).
- Management says active users grew 25% and seats are rising, and half of new business is no longer priced per user (C15, C12).
- Renewals have held at 98% through 2026, and no customer has been reported cutting ServiceNow seats because of AI (C05).
The rivals: CRM, MSFT, FRSH, TEAM, ORCL, WDAY, and 3 more that are private, in-house or listed abroad.
Who else does this, rival by rival
| Ticker | Rival | Where it competes | How far along | Priced against it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | Salesforce Agentforce IT ServicePriced against it: One segment only | Workflow subscriptions | On sale | One segment only |
| MSFT | Microsoft Agent 365 and Copilot agentsPriced against it: One segment only | Workflow subscriptions | On sale | One segment only |
| FRSH · TEAM | Freshservice and Jira Service ManagementPriced against it: Same product | Workflow subscriptions | On sale | Same product |
| Private | AI-native service desks such as ServalPriced against it: Private | Workflow subscriptions | On sale | Private |
| Private | OpenAI Frontier and other model makers' agent platformsPriced against it: Private | Workflow subscriptions | Announced | Private |
| In-house | Fewer human agents at the customerPriced against it: In-house | Workflow subscriptions | On sale | In-house |
| ORCL | OraclePriced against it: One segment only | - | On sale | One segment only |
| WDAY | WorkdayPriced against it: One segment only | - | On sale | One segment only |
How big it could get
How big this could get
Companies worldwide spent $1,271B on software in 2025, and Gartner expects 15.5% more in 2026, much of it on AI models. ServiceNow took about 1% of that.
Nobody publishes, free, how much goes on the kind of software it sells, so its real share of its own market is unknown, and larger than that 1%.
The evidence under this - 3 claims
Nobody publishes the slice of software spending that is service management and internal workflows, so this ratio is an understatement of ServiceNow's place in its own market (C35).
Who has signed
Customers have signed $29.0B of contracts not yet billed, and expect about 46% of it to arrive within a year. That covers most of next year's sales before a new deal is won.
The evidence under this - 2 claims
The company says part of the beat was US federal on-premise revenue pulled forward from Q3 2026; the CFO put it at about half of the beat (S03, S04).
Where the growth is coming from, business by business
Where the growth is coming from
| Business | Share of revenue | Growth: last quarter | Last half-year | Last year | Share in 3 years at its half-year rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| License and Service | 97% | +20.9% | +22.7% | - | 98% |
| Technology Service | 3% | +9.3% | +8.6% | - | 2% |
| Whole company | 100% | +20.5% | +22.2% | - | 100% |
On the filed split through 2026-09-30, if each business keeps its last half-year's growth, the company grows about 22% next year and 22% in year 3, against 22.2% over the last twelve months. A scenario, not a forecast: no business holds its rate.
The results
The numbers
Sales grew 22% over the twelve months to Sep 2026, about the same pace as the 21% in the year to Dec 2025.
Operating margin is 9.7%, about where it was (8.5%) in the year to Dec 2023.
Running costs take 63¢ of each sales dollar, down from 73¢ in the year to Dec 2021.
Each dollar put into the business earns 6.7% a year after tax, about where it was (5.7%) in the year to Dec 2021.
It turned 31% of sales into free cash, $4.75B over the last twelve months.
It owes $2.92B more than the cash it holds, about 0.5 years of the cash its operations bring in.
The share count rose 1.5% in 2.8 years, and pay in shares costs 15% of sales.
All the numbers
Filed figures from the company's 10-K and 10-Q, read 2026-10-28. Fiscal years end in December.
| Dec 2021 | Dec 2022 | Dec 2023 | Dec 2024 | Dec 2025 | 12 mo to Sep 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size and growth | ||||||
| Sales | $5.90B | $7.25B | $8.97B | $11.0B | $13.3B | $15.4B |
| Sales growth | +30% | +23% | +24% | +22% | +21% | +22% |
| Profit | ||||||
| Gross margin | 77% | 78% | 79% | 79% | 78% | 73% |
| Operating margin | 4.4% | 4.9% | 8.5% | 12% | 14% | 9.7% |
| Net margin | 3.9% | 4.5% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 9.4% |
| What growth costs, per sales dollar | ||||||
| Research and development | 24% | 24% | 24% | 23% | 22% | 22% |
| Sales and marketing | 39% | 39% | 37% | 35% | 33% | 32% |
| General and admin | 10% | 10% | 9.6% | 8.5% | 8.5% | 8.5% |
| Pay in shares | 19% | 19% | 18% | 16% | 15% | 15% |
| Capital spending | 6.6% | 7.6% | 7.7% | 7.8% | 6.5% | 3.8% |
| Cash | ||||||
| Cash from operations | $2.19B | $2.72B | $3.40B | $4.27B | $5.44B | $5.33B |
| Free cash flow | $1.80B | $2.17B | $2.70B | $3.42B | $4.58B | $4.75B |
| Balance sheet | ||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | $3.30B | $4.28B | $4.88B | $5.76B | $6.28B | $4.61B |
| Debt | $92.0M | $0 | - | - | $1.49B | $7.52B |
| Net cash | $3.21B | $4.28B | - | - | $4.79B | −$2.92B |
| Returns and shares | ||||||
| Return on capital | 5.7% | 6.6% | 12% | 13% | 12% | 6.7% |
| Shares (diluted) | - | - | 1.03B | 1.04B | 1.05B | 1.04B |
What growth costs
Until this year growth got cheaper. From 2021 to 2025 selling, research, overheads and pay in shares all fell as a share of sales, lifting the operating margin from 4.4% to 13.7%. In 2026 the acquisitions reversed that: write-offs of what it bought, deal costs and cloud hosting cut the June quarter's margin to 4%.
The evidence under this - 3 claims
The company says part of the beat was US federal on-premise revenue pulled forward from Q3 2026; the CFO put it at about half of the beat (S03, S04).
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35) reconciles Q3 non-GAAP subscription margin to 80.5% and holds the full-year guide at 81%.
The last report (22 Jul)
Quarter ended June 2026, filed figures.
In the September 2026 quarter subscription sales rose 21% to $3,988M, above the top of the company's guide, and contracted sales due within a year grew 20.5%, above the 19.5% it had guided. The company raised its goal for free cash flow, the cash left after spending, to 36% of sales from 35%.
The slowing continues: it guides contracted growth down to 18.5% for the December quarter. Subscription margin held at 80.5%, and the company kept its yearly guide at 81%.
What it did to the thesisIt supported the case that customers stay and growth holds up. It did not change the price question: growth is still slowing and the shares are higher than where we last priced them, so the view stays Neutral.
The quarter in detail
Sales growth from the previous quarter, filed figures.
Earnings per share $0.90 against $0.86 expected; $0.29 as filed, the gap being what the company adds back.
The evidence under this - 4 claims
Q2 pulled US federal on-premise revenue forward from Q3, so the Q3 beat is against a guide that already lost that revenue; the release does not size the effect.
- In April the guide outside Armis was held, not raised, and the shares fell 17.7% the next day (S08, S14).
- Each margin in the guide was cut by half a point to a point between January and July (S03, S05).
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35): Q3 beat the guide, free cash flow margin guide raised by one point to 36%, Q4 guide set.
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35) reports cRPO growth of 20.5%, above the 19.5% guide, and guides Q4 to 18.5%.
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35) reconciles Q3 non-GAAP subscription margin to 80.5% and holds the full-year guide at 81%.
What management did with the money
In six months it spent about $11B on three companies, $7.6B in cash on Armis, which secures connected devices. Net cash of $8.6B became about $0.9B of net debt. It also spent $2.2B buying back shares in early 2026, mostly at about $108.
Insiders in 2026Q3: 30 purchases and 64 sales, from their Form 4 filings.
The evidence under this - 3 claims
The price, and where we disagree
In short. Full. The price pays for the 2030 plan, including a sharp cut in pay in shares, and leaves little if growth slows or AI shrinks the users customers pay for.
The shares closed at $154.78 on 27 October 2026, 12.2% above the $137.97 the case was struck at, ahead of the third-quarter results that came out on 28 October and beat the guide.
The next test is the December-quarter results in late January 2027, with the first view of 2027: whether subscription sales reach the $4,245M to $4,255M guide, contracted growth holds at 18.5%, and what growth the company guides for next year.
The evidence under this - 4 claims
- In April the guide outside Armis was held, not raised, and the shares fell 17.7% the next day (S08, S14).
- Each margin in the guide was cut by half a point to a point between January and July (S03, S05).
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35): Q3 beat the guide, free cash flow margin guide raised by one point to 36%, Q4 guide set.
How we read the multiple
1. Over the year to June 2026 the business produced $2.40B of cash after pay in shares. 2. The company is valued at about $142.7B, about 60 times that. 3. On the 2026 plan that cash is about $3.1B, so about 46 times. 4. A common rule of thumb asks a share for about 9% a year; at 46 times the cash must grow about 7% a year for ever.
That is roughly the 2030 plan landing.
Against its own history. Buyers pay far less for each dollar of sales than a year ago while sales kept growing, so the fall came from the price, not the business.
The evidence under this - 5 claims
- If the 2030 plan lands, about $30B of subscription revenue at a Rule of 60 margin with stock pay under 10% gives roughly $10B of cash after stock pay, so today's price is about 14 times 2030 (C13).
- Net debt of about $0.9B is ignored here; adding it moves the multiple by under 1% (C09).
- In April the guide outside Armis was held, not raised, and the shares fell 17.7% the next day (S08, S14).
- Each margin in the guide was cut by half a point to a point between January and July (S03, S05).
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35): Q3 beat the guide, free cash flow margin guide raised by one point to 36%, Q4 guide set.
A $30B 2030 needs about 18% a year from the $15.8B 2026 guide while cRPO growth is slowing toward 19.5% with acquisitions inside it (C06).
Priced against its rivals
Only Freshworks sells the same thing to the same buyers as a large part of what it does. A price comparison needs at least two, so the price is judged against its own history instead.
Where we disagree with the market
An AI loser: agents will do support staff's work, customers will pay for fewer users, and the growth is behind it.
The AI damage is unproven, since customers stay and growth holds; but the price already pays for the 2030 plan.
The filings do not yet show the damage the market fears. Customers renew 98%, those paying over $5M a year keep rising, and growth held near 21% after currency. Management says active users grew 25%, though it files no user count.
But even if the fear is wrong, the price already pays for the 2030 plan. And against us on the downside, growth in contracted sales is slowing toward 19.5%.
What analysts say, and the evidence
The evidence under this - 6 claims
The company says part of the beat was US federal on-premise revenue pulled forward from Q3 2026; the CFO put it at about half of the beat (S03, S04).
No user or seat count appears in any filing, and the renewal rate leaves out changes in users, so the claim cannot be checked (S01).
- Management says active users grew 25% and seats are rising, and half of new business is no longer priced per user (C15, C12).
- Renewals have held at 98% through 2026, and no customer has been reported cutting ServiceNow seats because of AI (C05).
- If the 2030 plan lands, about $30B of subscription revenue at a Rule of 60 margin with stock pay under 10% gives roughly $10B of cash after stock pay, so today's price is about 14 times 2030 (C13).
- Net debt of about $0.9B is ignored here; adding it moves the multiple by under 1% (C09).
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35) reports cRPO growth of 20.5%, above the 19.5% guide, and guides Q4 to 18.5%.
What could go wrong, and how we would know
The risks
- AI shrinks the users If agents do support staff's work, customers may renew for fewer users, and AI editions and usage fees may not make up the difference.
- Rivals with agents Salesforce says 180 organisations chose its new IT desk in four months, and Microsoft builds agents into licences companies already own.
- Contracted growth is slowing Growth in sales due within a year slowed from 25% to 21%, with 19.5% guided next, even with acquisitions inside it.
- Margins are being squeezed Cloud hosting and AI cut the subscription margin from 83% to 80.5%, and management cut its 2026 margin guides twice.
- One federal partner One government reseller is 13% of sales and rising, while the Justice Department investigates the 2023 hiring of the Army's information chief.
- Debt after the spree About $2.1B of short-term borrowing must be rolled every few months after $11B of deals turned net cash into net debt.
The evidence under this - 7 claims
- Management says active users grew 25% and seats are rising, and half of new business is no longer priced per user (C15, C12).
- Renewals have held at 98% through 2026, and no customer has been reported cutting ServiceNow seats because of AI (C05).
Selected is not contracted, no value is given, the product appears in no Salesforce filing, and CoolSys is a private services firm (S23, S20).
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35) reports cRPO growth of 20.5%, above the 19.5% guide, and guides Q4 to 18.5%.
- 2026-10-28editedQ3 2026 release (S35) reconciles Q3 non-GAAP subscription margin to 80.5% and holds the full-year guide at 81%.
What we still do not know
- Whether the users customers pay for are rising or falling as AI spreads; the company files no user count.
- How much revenue Armis brings and how fast it grows; only its effect on growth, about 1.25 points, is given.
- How big ServiceNow's own market is, and its share of it; the research firms that measure it charge for it.
- What the Justice Department's investigation will conclude, and when.
The evidence under this - 4 claims
No user or seat count appears in any filing, and the renewal rate leaves out changes in users, so the claim cannot be checked (S01).
Nobody publishes the slice of software spending that is service management and internal workflows, so this ratio is an understatement of ServiceNow's place in its own market (C35).
What would change our view
- Neutral→AttractiveA cheaper price on an unchanged plan
It needs:
- ○The company is valued at about 30 times this year's cash after pay in shares, from about 46 today.about ≈$98.25 today, 29% below the last close
- Neutral→AttractiveGrowth re-accelerates and the margin steadies
It needs all of:
- ○Growth in contracted sales due within a year, after currency, speeds back up to 22% or more.checked at the next results, due by 28 Jan
- ○The subscription margin on the company's own basis holds at 80.5% or better.checked at the next results, due by 28 Jan
- Neutral→UnattractiveCustomers start to shrink
It needs any of:
- ○Growth in contracted sales due within a year, after currency, falls below 17%.checked at the next results, due by 28 Jan
- ○Customers renew less than 97% of their contracts in a year.checked at the next results, due by 28 Jan
We would also be wrong if
- The subscription margin on the company's own basis falls below 78% in any quarter.
- The Justice Department charges ServiceNow, or an agency bars it from federal contracts.
What is coming
- 28 October 2026 Q3 2026 results: Subscription revenue against the $3.975B to $3.98B guide after Q2 pulled revenue forward, cRPO growth against 19.5%, and the subscription margin.
Every dated event ahead
- 28 October 2026 Q3 2026 results: Subscription revenue against the $3.975B to $3.98B guide after Q2 pulled revenue forward, cRPO growth against 19.5%, and the subscription margin.
- 31 January 2027 Q4 2026 results and the 2027 guide: Whether 2027 is guided near the 18% a year the 2030 plan needs, with stock pay falling and headcount flat as pledged.
- 28 February 2027 2026 10-K: The renewal rate for 2026, the federal partner's share, headcount, and whether a risk factor on AI and per-user pricing appears.
Since we wrote this
- 29 OctEarningsServiceNow's call: early renewals flattered Q3 contracted sales and trim Q4. View heldQ3 2026 results.
- 28 OctEarningsBeat and raise: cRPO 20.5%, free cash flow guide 36%All three supports-if clauses cleared, but growth is still slowing to 18.5% by Q4 and the price is 12% above where the case was struck; Neutral holds.
- 7 OctThesis writtenNeutral, medium convictionWritten three weeks before Q3 results, with the shares 28.5% below their high after a year in which buyers paid 39% less per dollar of sales.
Sources 34
Sources - 34
Every claim above cites one of these, or states the reasoning that derived it. The quote is frozen at the date it was read: a link can rot, and an agent fetch returns a reading of a page rather than the page. Backs counts the whole claim ledger, so it can name a claim this page does not surface.
- S01primarycompany filing2026-01-29what it sells and how it prices, the four product areas, about 8,700 customers, 29,187 staff, the 98% renewal rate, customers over $5M, the competition section, the federal channel partner at 11% of revenue, the risk factors, RPO, the FY2025 statements, Moveworks and the pending Armis and Veza dealsbacksC01C02C05C08C10C11C14C22C27
- S02primarycompany filing2026-07-23the June 2026 balance sheet, the notes and commercial paper, the Armis and Veza purchase accounting, the amortisation schedule, the share count and buybacks, the federal channel partner at 13% of revenue, the DOJ matter and the cost of subscriptionbacksC03C05C07C08C09C10C11C14C17C40
- S03primarycompany release2026-07-22Q2 2026 subscription revenue, cRPO, RPO, GAAP and non-GAAP margins and their reconciliation, the on-premise pull-forward, the raised 2026 outlook, the Q3 guide and the 2030 targets set at the May analyst daybacksC03C04C05C06C07C12C13
- S04primarytranscript2026-07-22ServiceNow Q2 2026 earnings call transcript (FMP), held 22 July 2026the AI contract value, non-seat share of new business, Pro Plus price uplift, the Level 1 service desk agent, the headcount pledge, and analysts' questions on Salesforce's outcome pricing, seats and margins
ServiceNow AI ACV exceeded expectations again surpassing $1 billion, keeping us on track to beat our target of $1.5 billion ACV by the end of 2026.
backsC12C13C15C25C39 - S05primarycompany release2026-01-28FY2025 non-GAAP results and free cash flow, the first 2026 outlook, the $5B buyback authority and the 5-for-1 splitbacksC02C04C06C10
- S06primarycompany release2026-04-22Q1 2026 results, the Armis close and its 125 basis points of growth, the margin headwinds, termination-for-convenience in Armis contracts and the $4B term loanbacksC04C06C08
- S07primarycompany filing2026-04-23the Veza close, the accelerated buyback, and the federal channel partner at 12% of revenueread, but no claim rests on it
- S08primarytranscript2026-04-22ServiceNow Q1 2026 earnings call transcript (FMP), held 22 April 2026Morgan Stanley's question on the organic guide and the AI labs' growth, the $1.5B AI target, the 50% non-seat share of new business and the switching-cost anecdote; analysts' questions are a separate origin from the answers
yes, we didn't increase the revenue guide, excluding Armis, but we didn't take it down either
backsC12C20C25C39 - S09primarytranscript2026-01-28ServiceNow Q4 2025 earnings call transcript (FMP), held 28 January 2026Now Assist above $600M of ACV, active users, the Armis rationale, and analysts' questions on seats, model costs and gross margin
our monthly active users grew 25%
backsC07C15 - S10primarycompany filing2026-05-15the five note tranches, rates and maturitiesbacksC09
- S11primarycompany filing2026-02-17five executives cancelled their 10b5-1 sale plans and McDermott contracted to buy $3M of shares on 27 February 2026backsC19
- S12primarycompany filing2025-12-23McDermott stays through at least 31 December 2030backsC24
- S13primarycompany filing2026-04-06the executive officers, ownership table, the annual bonus and long-term award design and payouts, McDermott's 2025 pay and the pay ratiobacksC23C24
- S14secondaryvendor data2026-10-07NOW research pack (FMP, FINRA, SEC XBRL), frozencontent/NOW/research-pack.jsonthe close of 6 October 2026, the price move split, the rating series, short interest, insider trades, analysts' estimates and the filed five-year statementsbacksC17C19C20C22
- S15primaryindustry data2026-07-27worldwide software spending in 2025 and the 2026 forecast, with growth; read on Gartner's own mirror because www.gartner.com refused
Software || 1,271 || 13.9 || 1,468 || 15.5
backsC35 - S17primarygovernment data2026-09-01US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook: computer support specialists (2025 to 2035 projections) US Bureau of Labor Statistics750,600 computer user support specialists in 2025, projected to fall 3% to 724,400 by 2035; read twice through an agent fetch because bls.gov refuses scripts
Employment of computer user support specialists is projected to decline as organizations continue to implement automated tools, such as chatbots, for troubleshooting.
backsC34 - S18primarygovernment data2026-09-01US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook: customer service representatives (2025 to 2035 projections) US Bureau of Labor Statistics2,666,000 customer service representatives in 2025, projected to fall 5% by 2035
There is expected to be less demand for customer service representatives, especially in retail trade, as their tasks continue to be automated.
backsC34 - S19primaryregulator2026-10-07FedRAMP Marketplace: ServiceNow Government Community Cloud US General Services Administration (FedRAMP)certified at the High impact level since 12 August 2019, with 101 agency authorisations to operate or use it
Total Authority to Operate (ATO) and/or Authority to Use (ATU) letters, including initial and reuse authorizations.
backsC37 - S20primarycompany filing2026-02-26Freshworks names ServiceNow among traditional IT service management vendors it competes withbacksC31
- S21primarycompany filing2026-03-06Workday names ServiceNow among its competitors and warns of rivals built on general-purpose AI agentsbacksC31
- S22primarycompany release2026-08-04employee experience (Freshservice) annual recurring revenue growth
EX ARR grew 24% year-over-year, and Freddy AI Copilot is now attached to over 71% of new enterprise deals.
backsC31 - S23primarycompany release2026-02-26more than 180 organizations selected Agentforce IT Service in four months; CoolSys replacing ServiceNow
CoolSys is adopting Agentforce to increase IT team productivity, reduce total cost of ownership, and replace its legacy ServiceNow implementation.
backsC30 - S24primarycompany release2025-12-05Serval release: $75M Series B at a $1B valuation, led by Sequoia (CIO Dive press-release section) Serval (private)an AI-native IT service desk raising at $1B, with small AI companies as named customers
Serval , the AI-native IT service management (ITSM) platform, today announced it has raised $75 million in Series B funding, attaining a $1 billion valuation.
backsC33 - S25secondarynews2026-02-05OpenAI's agent platform launch, its rivals, and OpenAI's three-year model deal with ServiceNow
Frontier is a one-stop shop for enterprise oversight and management of "AI coworkers" that can operate across existing business systems.
backsC32 - S26primarygovernment data2026-09-24US Census Bureau, Business Trends and Outlook Survey, national response estimates (period ending 6 September 2026) US Census Bureau23.8% of businesses using AI in the latest two weeks against 17.7% in late December 2025, and 27.6% expecting to within six months
In the last two weeks, did this business use Artificial Intelligence (AI) in any of its business functions?
backsC36 - S27primarygovernment data2026-04-03Federal Reserve Board, FEDS Note: Monitoring AI Adoption in the U.S. Economy Federal Reserve Boardfirm adoption of about 18% at end-2025, and about 78% of the labour force working at firms that have adopted AI
Business survey data from the Census Bureau show that about 18 percent of firms have adopted AI as of year-end 2025.
backsC36 - S28secondarynews2025-09-02the federal discount ServiceNow gave to move agencies onto its AI editions
ServiceNow offer up to a 70% discount off the list price to upgrades of its new Information Technology Service Management Pro and Pro-plus bundle
backsC37 - S29secondarynews2026-01-29the objection the market stated after Q4 2025 results
that works out to organic growth of 19%, below the key psychological threshold of 20% investors look for, according to KeyBanc analyst Jackson Ader.
backsC21 - S30secondarynews2026-04-22the objection the market stated after Q1 2026 results
delays in closing several large government deals in the Middle East hurt first-quarter subscription revenue growth, sending its shares down 12% in extended trading.
backsC21 - S31secondarynews2026-02-03Reuters (via Yahoo Finance): Anthropic's AI tools deepen selloff in software and data stocks Reutersthe per-user pricing fear behind the February 2026 software selloff
AI tools allow businesses to do more with fewer staff, threatening the traditional model of charging per software user.
backsC21 - S32secondarynews2025-12-15Sherwood News: ServiceNow tumbles on report it is nearing a deal to buy a cybersecurity firm Sherwood NewsKeyBanc's downgrade on Microsoft Agent 365, and Bloomberg Intelligence calling the Armis price expensive
warning that the software company is facing stiff competition from Microsoft's Agent 365.
backsC38 - S33primarycompany filing2024-08-16Atlassian named ServiceNow among cloud vendors competing for IT teams; its FY2026 10-K names no competitorbacksC31
- S34primarycompany filing2026-10-07ServiceNow filed statements, SEC company facts (content/NOW/financials.json)content/NOW/financials.jsonfive fiscal years and the twelve months to June 2026 of filed revenue, cash flow, stock pay and cost linesbacksC40
- S35primarycompany release2026-10-28Q3 2026 subscription revenue, cRPO, RPO, the subscription margin reconciliation, the raised free cash flow margin and AI contract value target, and the Q4 2026 guidebacksC04C06C07C41