← כל התזותNTAPלא אטרקטיביתביטחון בינונייום שישי, 11 בספטמבר 2026English

NetApp

היא מוכרת מערכות אחסון משותפות גדולות שחברות שומרות עליהן את המידע שלהן, מפעילה אותן בתוכנה משלה, ומשכירה את אותה תוכנה גם בתוך הענן של Amazon ושל Microsoft.

הציון שלנולא אטרקטיבית ביטחון בינוני
הציונים
ציונים · 1-4
צמיחה3/4 ↑

שלושה רבעונים של האצה, אבל היא רק עוקבת אחרי שוק ש-IDC מדווחת שצמח באותו קצב, והרקורד קצר משנתיים.

איכות העסק3/4 →

ONTAP נמכרת כשירות של ספקית הענן עצמה בתוך AWS ו-Azure, אבל עשר ספקיות מחזיקות בהסמכה של NVIDIA, והלקוחות עברו לדגמים זולים יותר כשהמחירים עלו.

איתנות פיננסית4/4 →

מזומן נטו, תזרים מפעילות שוטפת של 2,067 מיליון דולר בשנת הכספים 2026, ו-3,576 מיליון דולר במזומן מול חלות שוטפת של חוב בסך 550 מיליון דולר.

יכולת ביצוע3/4 ↑

שמונה דוחות ברצף מעל התחזיות, ורכישות חוזרות שהתרכזו כשהמניה עמדה על כ-106 דולר. אבל רקורד התחזיות הנקי כאן מכסה שנתיים בלבד.

ערך לבעלי המניות4/4 ↓

מספר המניות ירד ב-1.5%, הרכישות החוזרות היו כפולות מהתגמול במניות, ושתי הרכישות של חברות שולמו במזומן. אבל ככל שהמחיר עלה, מספר המניות שנרכשו ירד בחצי.

פוטנציאל2/4 →

העלייה תלויה במחזור החלפת ציוד שאינו בשליטתה, ולפי הדוח שלה עצמה אין מאחוריו התחייבויות רכש מחייבות לטווח ארוך.

רמת סיכון3/4 →

שני מפיצים אחראים ל-43% מההכנסות, ומספר מצומצם של ספקים שולט ב-NAND, אבל הביקוש הסופי מפוזר בין אזורים ותעשיות.

תמחור2/4 ↓

במכפיל של 20 על הרווח הצפוי, לעומת חציון של כ-17 בשש השנים האחרונות, המחיר דורש שהכנסות השנה יהיו בסיס ולא שיא.

חוזק הראיות3/4 →

הנתונים המרכזיים מופיעים בדוחות ואושרו על ידי IDC,‏ TrendForce ו-NVIDIA, אבל היקף הביקוש שהוקדם נשען על טענה של ההנהלה שאיש אינו יכול לאמת.

השורה התחתונה

הציון שלנו: לא אטרקטיבית. התוכנה של NetApp מנהלת את המידע של חברות גדולות, ו-Amazon ו-Microsoft מוכרות אותה בשמן. העסק טוב, אבל במשך עשור הוא צמח לאט. ברבעון האחרון הצמיחה הגיעה לכמעט שליש, בעיקר בגלל שבוע נוסף, מחירי זיכרון פלאש שמזנקים וקנייה מוקדמת של לקוחות, והתחזית של החברה עצמה מחזירה את הצמיחה לספרה אחת. המחיר מתייחס לשנה הזו כאל בסיס ולא כאל שיא, ולכן הוא מלא ולא זול. ההערכה תלויה בשאלה אם הצמיחה תמשיך לעקוף את השוק אחרי שהגורמים החד-פעמיים האלה ייעלמו. לדעתנו הגאות היא בעיקר זעזוע מחירים ולא ביקוש חדש.

הטיעון לטווח הארוךNetApp לא נשענת על ביקוש חדש ל-AI כל כך כמו על שדרוגי אחסון שנדחו ועל מחירי פלאש מזנקים. כדי שהצמיחה תימשך, היא צריכה להחזיק מעמד גם אחרי ששניהם ידעכו.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 8 טענות
C01עובדהhigh confidence
NetApp sells enterprise data-storage systems - all-flash and hybrid-flash arrays running its own ONTAP data-management software - together with support contracts on the installed base, and sells the same ONTAP software as a managed cloud service on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.
current state · 2026-04-24written 2026-09-11
C02עובדהhigh confidence
Amazon Web Services sells NetApp's ONTAP as an AWS service, Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, and Microsoft describes Azure NetApp Files in its own documentation as an 'Azure native, first-party' storage service. The word first-party is Microsoft's.
current state · 2026-09-11written 2026-09-11
C23עובדהhigh confidence
NetApp's revenue grew from $5,491 million in fiscal 2017 to $6,925 million in fiscal 2026 - a compound rate of about 2.6% a year, with two of those ten years showing a decline.
historical · fiscal 2017 to fiscal 2026written 2026-09-11
C08עובדהhigh confidence
Revenue in the quarter ended 31 July 2026 was $2,025 million, up 30% year on year - but the quarter ran 98 days against 91 days a year earlier, fourteen weeks against thirteen.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C09טענת ההנהלהmedium confidence
Management states the additional week contributed approximately $65 million of revenue, 'primarily in support and public cloud', and that revenue grew 26% excluding it - with support growing 4% rather than 11% and public cloud 19% rather than 28%.
against this
  • The $65 million is management's own estimate and no filing discloses it or any basis for it. A simple one-fourteenth of the quarter's revenue would be about $145 million, so the company's figure assumes the extra week added almost nothing to product revenue - defensible, since product revenue is recognised on shipment rather than rateably, but it is an assumption of management's rather than an observation.
  • Applied to support alone the $50 million management attributes is about 7.5% of the $670 million support would otherwise have been, which is close to one-thirteenth and therefore internally consistent. That the arithmetic is consistent does not make it verified: the same arithmetic would be consistent at any product-revenue attribution management chose.
  • Even taking the figure at face value it concedes the direction of the argument rather than resisting it: 30% becomes 26%, support growth becomes 4%, and public cloud growth becomes 19%.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C26הסקהmedium confidence
At $199.28 the price is 20.2 times the midpoint of guided fiscal 2027 non-GAAP earnings and 26.6 times guided GAAP earnings, against a six-year median trailing multiple of 17.2 - so the price requires this year's revenue level to be a base rather than a peak, and requires the multiple to survive the return to mid-single-digit growth that the company's own second half, IDC's 2027 forecast and the sell-side's fiscal 2028 estimate all describe.
derivedThe price and the trailing multiples come from the frozen pack (C25, S14). The guided EPS midpoints are $9.88 non-GAAP and $7.50 GAAP (C12, S03), giving 20.2x and 26.6x at $199.28. The three descriptions of what comes next are the guided second half at about 8.6% (C15), IDC's 2027 forecast of 5.4% for the market (C05), and consensus fiscal 2028 revenue of $8,654M against the fiscal 2027 guidance midpoint of $8,100M, 6.4% (C33). The frame is mid-cycle earnings power rather than peak earnings, which is why the comparison is struck against the company's own multi-year multiple rather than against this year's guided one.
against this
  • Twenty times forward earnings is not a demanding multiple in absolute terms for a company with net cash, a 93%-margin annuity and a first-party position at two hyperscalers. On fiscal 2028 consensus earnings of $11.04 the multiple is 18.1x, which is a price a mid-single-digit grower can carry without the thesis being right about anything.
  • The re-rating may be the market correctly recognising that a decade of 3% growth understated the business, in the same way the six-year median understates it - IDC's own 7.3% compound forecast through 2030 is nearly three times NetApp's realised ten-year rate, so even the outside measurer expects a faster market than the past.
  • The argument is a claim about the durability of a revenue level, and nothing in the file settles it. Management asserts structural improvement in demand; the thesis asserts a price cycle; both are consistent with every filed figure in the quarter.
current state · 2026-09-11written 2026-09-11
C27עובדהhigh confidence
Non-GAAP earnings of $2.58 a share exclude $0.70 of adjustments, of which stock-based compensation of $98 million is about $0.49 - so the multiple the market quotes is struck on a figure that adds back roughly half a dollar a share of a real cost, and the same gap runs through the full-year guide at $9.88 non-GAAP against $7.50 GAAP.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C20טענת ההנהלהlow confidence
The chief executive said certain transactions expected to build out over multiple quarters happened within the first quarter instead, described customers choosing to fit out two of four data centres early, declined to break the effect out, and characterised it as not a material part of the overall business.
against this
  • The two halves of the answer sit awkwardly together: a pull-forward that is immaterial does not need a data-centre example to explain it, and one worth describing at that length is being sized at zero by assertion. Two analysts asked for the magnitude and neither got a number.
  • Management volunteered the existence of accelerated purchasing in the prepared remarks rather than being extracted under questioning, which is the behaviour of a management team disclosing an inconvenient fact rather than hiding one, and is evidence for taking the 'not material' characterisation seriously.
  • The CEO's stated reason is checkable in principle and favourable: he said very few customers have the financial flexibility to pull spending forward, and that those which did also deferred other projects to fund it - which if true makes the net effect on the quarter smaller than the gross pull-forward.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
01

החברה

חברות גדולות שומרות את הנתונים המשותפים שלהן בארונות עם כונני פלאש וכוננים רגילים, ובקדמתם בקרים. NetApp מוכרת את המערכות האלה, מפעילה אותן בתוכנת ההפעלה שלה, ONTAP, ומוכרת חוזי תמיכה על כל מה שמותקן.

אותה תוכנה מושכרת כשירות גם בתוך ענקיות הענן. Amazon מוכרת אותה כשירות של AWS, והתיעוד של Microsoft עצמה מכנה את שירות NetApp שלה שירות 'מקורי' של הספקית (first-party).

הראיות (באנגלית) · 2 טענות
C01עובדהhigh confidence
NetApp sells enterprise data-storage systems - all-flash and hybrid-flash arrays running its own ONTAP data-management software - together with support contracts on the installed base, and sells the same ONTAP software as a managed cloud service on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.
current state · 2026-04-24written 2026-09-11
C02עובדהhigh confidence
Amazon Web Services sells NetApp's ONTAP as an AWS service, Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, and Microsoft describes Azure NetApp Files in its own documentation as an 'Azure native, first-party' storage service. The word first-party is Microsoft's.
current state · 2026-09-11written 2026-09-11

ממה היא מרוויחה

בשתי דרכים, בשיעורי רווח שונים מאוד. החומרה הייתה 987 מיליון דולר מתוך 2.03 מיליארד דולר מכירות ברבעון, ונשארו ממנה 54.6 סנט מכל דולר אחרי עלותה. חוזי תמיכה ושירותי ענן משאירים הרבה יותר: 93.2 ו-86.4 סנט. ההכנסה החוזרת הזו היא העסק במיטבו, והיא צמחה ברבעון רק ב-4% אחרי שמנטרלים את השבוע הנוסף.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 4 טענות
C03עובדהmedium confidence
In the quarter ended 31 July 2026 NetApp's support revenue carried a 93.2% gross margin and its public cloud revenue 86.4%, against 54.6% on product revenue.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C08עובדהhigh confidence
Revenue in the quarter ended 31 July 2026 was $2,025 million, up 30% year on year - but the quarter ran 98 days against 91 days a year earlier, fourteen weeks against thirteen.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C10עובדהhigh confidence
Product revenue was $987 million in the quarter, up 51%, and rose to 49% of total revenue from 42% a year earlier - while product gross margin fell 150 basis points sequentially to 54.6%, which management attributed to higher component costs partly offset by better pricing.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C11עובדהhigh confidence
Support revenue grew 4% excluding the extra week, and deferred revenue - the balance the support annuity is billed into - was $4.85 billion, up 7% year on year, against reported revenue growth of 30%.
against this
  • Remaining performance obligations grew 14%, twice the deferred-revenue rate, which is the bull's answer: contracts are being signed faster than they are being billed. It is a real point and it is bounded - the 10-Q says 44% of the $5.6 billion is expected within twelve months, so the twelve-month portion is about $2.5 billion against a guided year of roughly $8.1 billion.
  • Support revenue lags product revenue by construction: an array sold this quarter attaches a support contract that bills over the following years, so a 4% support line is partly a report on what was sold three years ago. If the product surge is durable, support growth should follow it with a lag - which is precisely what the invalidation criterion on support growth is written to catch.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
פירוט מקורות ההכנסה
מקורמשקל במכירות (הרבעון הראשון, שנת הכספים 2027)איך
מוצר48.7%מערכות אחסון all-flash ו-hybrid-flash עם תוכנת ONTAP, שנמכרות בעיקר דרך מפיצים ומשווקים, וההכנסה נרשמת במועד המשלוח.
תמיכה35.6%חוזי תמיכה רב-שנתיים על הבסיס המותקן. הלקוחות משלמים מראש, והסכום נרשם כהכנסה נדחית וממומש לאורך תקופת החוזה.
שירותים מקצועיים ואחרים5.5%התקנה, ייעוץ, שירותים מנוהלים והדרכה הנלווים לעסקאות Hybrid Cloud.
ענן ציבורי10.2%שירותי אחסון ונתונים מבוססי ONTAP שנמכרים כשירותים בתוך AWS,‏ Azure וגם Google Cloud, ומשולמים ברובם לפי צריכה.

ההנהלה

ג'ורג' קוריאן מנהל את NetApp מאז 2015; שניים מחמשת בכירי החברה, סמנכ״ל הכספים וראש מערך המוצר, הצטרפו ב-2025. בעלי העניין מחזיקים הרבה פחות מ-1% מהחברה. הבונוס השנתי נקבע בעיקר לפי הרווח המתואם והמכירות; המניות לטווח ארוך נקבעות חצי לפי חיובי הלקוחות (billings) וחצי לפי תשואת המניה מול המתחרות. החיובים עולים כשהמחירים עולים, ולכן העלאות המחירים של השנה, שמקורן בשבבים, מעלות גם את השכר ולא רק את המכירות.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 3 טענות
C43עובדהhigh confidence
George Kurian has been chief executive since June 1, 2015, after running product operations; César Cernuda joined as president from Microsoft in July 2020 and runs go-to-market; Wissam Jabre became chief financial officer in March 2025 after three years as Western Digital's CFO; Syam Nair joined as chief product officer in June 2025.
current state · 2026-06-05written 2026-10-04
C41עובדהhigh confidence
As of July 13, 2026 the 14 current directors, nominees and executive officers as a group beneficially owned 701,159 shares, under 1% of the 196,234,265 outstanding; chief executive George Kurian held 362,354, the largest insider stake; BlackRock (9.87%), two Vanguard entities (7.34% and 6.48%) and State Street (5.24%) were the holders above 5%.
current state · 2026-07-13written 2026-10-04
C42עובדהhigh confidence
NetApp's fiscal 2026 annual bonus paid on adjusted operating income (50%), revenue (30%), cloud storage revenue (10%) and block-storage revenue growth (10%); the company factor came to 89.5% and the chief executive's payout to 94.0% of target. Long-term PBRSUs, 75% of the chief executive's annual grant, vest half on three-year total shareholder return against a peer group and half on billings; the fiscal 2024 grant paid 91.76%.
against this

Billings is revenue plus the change in deferred revenue, so a year of component-driven price rises lifts the metric the long-term awards pay on without any change in demand (C40); nothing in the plan pays on free cash flow, which fell 35% in the latest quarter (C16).

historical · fiscal 2026 and the fiscal 2024-2026 PBRSU cyclewritten 2026-10-04
02

היתרון התחרותי, ומי מאיים עליו

למה הלקוחות נשארים

חברות לא קונות רק ארגז אחסון; הן מתקננות סביב ONTAP. לוחות הגיבוי, תוכניות ההתאוששות מאסון ותיעוד הציות שלהן כתובים מולה, ולכן מעבר פירושו העברת כמויות עצומות של נתונים והוכחה מחדש של כל נוהל בפני מבקר.

ההפתעה היא הענן. הוא היה אמור להיות היציאה, אבל Amazon ו-Microsoft אימצו את ONTAP ומוכרות אותה תחת המותג שלהן, ולכן מי שעובר לענן נשאר בתוך התוכנה של NetApp.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 2 טענות
C01עובדהhigh confidence
NetApp sells enterprise data-storage systems - all-flash and hybrid-flash arrays running its own ONTAP data-management software - together with support contracts on the installed base, and sells the same ONTAP software as a managed cloud service on AWS, Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud.
current state · 2026-04-24written 2026-09-11
C02עובדהhigh confidence
Amazon Web Services sells NetApp's ONTAP as an AWS service, Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, and Microsoft describes Azure NetApp Files in its own documentation as an 'Azure native, first-party' storage service. The word first-party is Microsoft's.
current state · 2026-09-11written 2026-09-11

האיום

בפינת ה-AI של האחסון המתחרות חזקות ביותר. NVIDIA מסמיכה עשר ספקיות אחסון למערכות שלה, כך שהתג ש-NetApp מציגה בראש הוא של עוד תשע. שתיים מהן חדשות ופרטיות, VAST Data ו-WEKA, שמוכרות אחסון ייעודי לאותם אשכולות AI שהקו החדש ביותר של NetApp מכוון אליהם, ואף דוח לא מראה כמה הן לוקחות.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 2 טענות
C04עובדהmedium confidence
NVIDIA's certified enterprise storage programme names ten vendors - DDN, Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Hitachi Vantara, IBM, NetApp, Nutanix, Pure Storage, VAST Data and WEKA - so the NVIDIA qualification NetApp's AI positioning leads with is shared with nine others, two of them private AI-native entrants.
current state · 2025-03-18written 2026-09-11
C35הסקהmedium confidence
VAST Data and WEKA hold the same NVIDIA storage certification as NetApp and sell purpose-built storage into the GPU clusters NetApp's AFX line is designed for, so the AI segment NetApp leads its story with is the one part of its market where the entrants are strongest - and both are private, so no filing discloses what they are taking.
derivedNVIDIA's own certified list carries both alongside NetApp (C04, S09). NetApp's 10-K positions AFX as disaggregated scale-out storage built for the AI-powered enterprise and its CEO described AFX as aimed at the GPU-as-a-service category with few but large transactions (C01, S04). Neither VAST Data nor WEKA appears in EDGAR's company index, so their scale is not checkable from a filing; that unverifiability is itself the finding rather than an estimate of their share.
against this
  • The AI-native entrants sell performance into training and inference clusters and do not carry the enterprise data-protection chain - snapshot, immutable retention, ransomware detection, replication into a hyperscaler's own first-party service - that ONTAP's installed base is built on, so they are competing for the new GPU-attached workload rather than for the estate.
  • NetApp won the quarter's showcase AI deals against them on its own account, including a public-sector private AI cloud on AFX with NVIDIA SuperPOD and an Asian neo-cloud displacing incumbents, so the entrants are not winning uncontested.
  • A certification list is a floor rather than a ranking: being on it says a vendor cleared NVIDIA's performance bar, not that buyers treat the ten as interchangeable.
current state · 2026-09-11written 2026-09-11

המתחרות: DELL, P, AMZN, HPE, ועוד שתיים: פרטיות, פיתוח פנימי של לקוחות או נסחרות בחו״ל.

פירוט המתחרים
סימולמתחרהשלבבסיס להשוואה
חברה פרטיתVAST Data (פלטפורמת VAST Data, ארכיטקטורת DASE)בסיס להשוואה: חברה פרטיתכבר נמכרחברה פרטית
חברה פרטיתWEKA (פלטפורמת WEKA Data Platform)בסיס להשוואה: חברה פרטיתכבר נמכרחברה פרטית
DELLDell Technologies (PowerScale ו-PowerStore)בסיס להשוואה: חלק קטן ממנהכבר נמכרחלק קטן ממנה
PEverpure,‏ Inc. (לשעבר Pure Storage) - FlashArray ו-FlashBladeבסיס להשוואה: אותו מוצרכבר נמכראותו מוצר
AMZNAmazon S3 ושירותי האחסון המקוריים של ענקיות הענן לאובייקטים ולקבציםבסיס להשוואה: מוצר שונהכבר נמכרמוצר שונה
HPEHewlett Packard Enterpriseבסיס להשוואה: חלק קטן ממנהכבר נמכרחלק קטן ממנה
03

פוטנציאל הצמיחה

גודל ההזדמנות

לפי IDC, שוק האחסון ש-NetApp מוכרת אליו הסתכם ב-35.3 מיליארד דולר ב-2025; מכירות החומרה של NetApp היו כ-9% ממנו. IDC צופה 41.1 מיליארד דולר ב-2026, אבל צמיחה של 5.4% בלבד ב-2027.

היא מוסיפה שהתייקרות הרכיבים מנפחת את הסכומים הללו מעבר למה שהיה נובע מהיקף המשלוחים. מחירי פלאש לארגונים עלו במצטבר ב-235% במהלך 2026.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 4 טענות
C05עובדהmedium confidence
IDC measured the worldwide external OEM enterprise storage market at $9.9 billion in the first calendar quarter of 2026, up 22.9% year on year, against 3.9% growth for full-year 2025; its forecast table puts the market at $35,337M in 2025, $41,089M in 2026 and $43,311M in 2027, a 5.4% increase in that final year, on a 7.3% compound trend through 2030.
current state · 2026-07-01written 2026-09-11
C36עובדהmedium confidence
NetApp's fiscal 2026 product revenue was $3,194 million against IDC's measurement of a $35,337 million worldwide external OEM enterprise storage market in calendar 2025 - about one dollar in eleven of the market it sells into.
historical · NetApp fiscal 2026 against IDC calendar 2025written 2026-09-11
C06עובדהhigh confidence
IDC attributes the acceleration to 'the convergence of deferred infrastructure refresh spending, component price inflation, and AI-driven storage demand', and says component constraints 'continue to push system-level prices upward, further amplifying revenue growth beyond what shipment volumes alone would suggest'. Two of its three stated causes are not AI demand.
current state · 2026-07-01written 2026-09-11
C07עובדהmedium confidence
TrendForce puts enterprise SSD contract prices up around 35% in 2H25 and a cumulative 235% across 2026, with NAND flash contract prices rising 70-75% quarter on quarter in 2Q26 - the quarter that sits inside NetApp's first fiscal quarter.
current state · 2026-08-25written 2026-09-11

מי כבר התחייב

בעיקר ההכנסה החוזרת מתמיכה. NetApp מחזיקה ב-5.6 מיליארד דולר של הכנסות עתידיות בחוזים, 44% מהן לתשלום בתוך שנה, אבל הזמנות חומרה אפשר לבטל לפני המשלוח, והן לא נספרות. שני מפיצים לוקחים 43% מהמכירות. ההסכם החדש היחיד, עם Samsung, לא כולל היקף או תקופה.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 3 טענות
C21עובדהhigh confidence
Remaining performance obligations were $5.6 billion at 31 July 2026, of which NetApp expects to recognise 44% within twelve months; the 10-Q states that orders in backlog are cancellable without penalty prior to shipment and are excluded from that figure, so no product backlog stands behind the guided year.
current state · 2026-07-31written 2026-09-11
C18עובדהhigh confidence
Two customers, each of which is a distributor, accounted for 22% and 21% of NetApp's fiscal 2026 net revenues - 43% between them, a share the 10-K states directly in Item 1 and which has been above 40% in each of the last three years.
historical · fiscal 2026, the year ended 24 April 2026written 2026-09-11
C37טענת ההנהלהlow confidence
NetApp signed an agreement with Samsung Electronics in the quarter to support its electronic-design-automation environment and AI Center of Excellence, announced on the earnings call with no volume, no term and no filed agreement.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
04

התוצאות

המספרים

היא צומחת?בקצב יציב

המכירות צמחו ב-12% ב-12 החודשים שהסתיימו ביולי 2026, מהר יותר מ-5.4% בשנה שהסתיימה באפריל 2026.

Apr 2022: $6.32BApr 2023: $6.36BApr 2024: $6.27BApr 2025: $6.57BApr 2026: $6.92B12 mo to Jul 2026: $7.39B$6.32B$7.39B
היא רווחית?מאוד

שיעור הרווח התפעולי עומד על 25%, לעומת 19% בשנה שהסתיימה באפריל 2024.

Apr 2022: 18%Apr 2023: 16%Apr 2024: 19%Apr 2025: 20%Apr 2026: 24%12 mo to Jul 2026: 25%18%25%
הצמיחה משתלמת?משתלמת

ההוצאות התפעוליות אוכלות 46 סנט מכל דולר מכירות, לעומת 48 סנט בשנה שהסתיימה באפריל 2022.

Apr 2022: 48¢Apr 2023: 50¢Apr 2024: 51¢Apr 2025: 50¢Apr 2026: 47¢12 mo to Jul 2026: 46¢48¢46¢
התשואה על ההון גבוהה?גבוהה מאוד

התשואה על ההון המושקע היא 39% בשנה אחרי מס, לעומת 29% בשנה שהסתיימה באפריל 2022.

Apr 2022: 29%Apr 2023: 29%Apr 2024: 27%Apr 2025: 29%Apr 2026: 32%12 mo to Jul 2026: 39%29%39%
היא מייצרת מזומנים?הרבה

22% מהמכירות הפכו לתזרים מזומנים חופשי: 1.65 מיליארד דולר ב-12 החודשים האחרונים.

Apr 2022: $985MApr 2023: $868MApr 2024: $1.53BApr 2025: $1.34BApr 2026: $1.87B12 mo to Jul 2026: $1.65B$985M$1.65B
המאזן איתן?מזומן נטו

יש לה 3.58 מיליארד דולר במזומן מול חוב של 2.49 מיליארד דולר, כלומר מזומן נטו של 1.09 מיליארד דולר.

Apr 2022: $434MApr 2023: $681MApr 2024: $860MApr 2025: $611MApr 2026: $1.10B12 mo to Jul 2026: $1.09B$434M$1.09B
בעלי המניות מדוללים?לא, מספר המניות יורד

מספר המניות ירד ב-13% ב-4.3 שנים, והתגמול במניות מסתכם ב-5.4% מהמכירות.

Apr 2022: 229MApr 2023: 220MApr 2024: 213MApr 2025: 209MApr 2026: 201M12 mo to Jul 2026: 200M229M200M
כל המספרים

נתונים מדוחות ה-10-K וה-10-Q של החברה, נכון ל-4 באוקטובר 2026. שנת הכספים מסתיימת באפריל.

אפריל 2022אפריל 2023אפריל 2024אפריל 2025אפריל 202612 חודשים עד יולי 2026
גודל וצמיחה
מכירות$6.32B$6.36B$6.27B$6.57B$6.92B$7.39B
צמיחת המכירות+10.0%+0.7%−1.5%+4.9%+5.4%+12%
רווח
שיעור הרווח הגולמי67%66%71%70%71%71%
שיעור הרווח התפעולי18%16%19%20%24%25%
שיעור הרווח הנקי15%20%16%18%18%19%
עלות הצמיחה, לכל דולר מכירות
מחקר ופיתוח14%15%16%15%14%14%
מכירות ושיווק29%29%29%28%27%26%
הנהלה וכלליות4.4%4.2%4.9%4.7%5.0%4.8%
תגמול מבוסס מניות3.9%4.9%5.7%5.9%5.5%5.4%
השקעות הוניות3.6%3.8%2.5%2.6%2.9%3.3%
מזומנים
תזרים מפעילות שוטפת$1.21B$1.11B$1.69B$1.51B$2.07B$1.90B
תזרים מזומנים חופשי$985M$868M$1.53B$1.34B$1.87B$1.65B
מאזן
מזומנים והשקעות לזמן קצר$3.07B$3.07B$3.25B$3.85B$3.58B$3.58B
חוב$2.64B$2.39B$2.39B$3.23B$2.49B$2.49B
מזומן נטו$434M$681M$860M$611M$1.10B$1.09B
תשואות ומניות
תשואה על ההון המושקע29%29%27%29%32%39%
מספר המניות (בדילול מלא)229M220M213M209M201M200M

עלות הצמיחה

הצמיחה הפכה את NetApp לרווחית יותר: ההוצאה על מחקר ומכירות גדלה לאט בהרבה מהמכירות, כך שכל מכירה נוספת משאירה יותר רווח. הבעיה היא החומרה עצמה. שבבי הזיכרון בתוך כל מערכת מתייקרים, ולכן המכירות הנוספות של השנה נושאות שיעור רווח נמוך מהישנות, ותחזית החברה עצמה כבר מראה זאת.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 2 טענות
C45עובדהhigh confidence
Per sales dollar, research and development went from 15.3 cents in fiscal 2021 to 14.3 in fiscal 2026 and 13.8 over the four quarters to July 2026, sales and marketing from 30.4 to 27.0 and 25.9, and general and administrative from 4.5 to 5.0 and 4.8, while stock compensation rose from 3.4 to 5.5 and 5.4 and operating margin from 17.9% to 24.2% and 25.0%; research spending was about $1.0B in each of fiscal 2024 to 2026.
against this

The fiscal 2027 guide lowers GAAP gross margin to 67.1-68.1% from 70.7%, an incremental margin near 49% (C12, C13), so the operating-cost leverage is being spent on product cost rather than reaching the bottom line at the old rate.

historical · fiscal 2021 to the four quarters to July 2026written 2026-10-04
C13אומדןmedium confidence
The fiscal 2027 guidance implies an incremental gross margin of about 49% on this year's revenue growth - roughly $577 million of extra gross profit on roughly $1,175 million of extra revenue - against the 70.7% gross margin the whole company earned in fiscal 2026.
derivedFiscal 2026 filed revenue of $6,925M at a filed 70.74% gross margin gives $4,899M of gross profit (C12, S01). The fiscal 2027 guidance midpoints - $8,100M of revenue at a 67.6% GAAP gross margin - give $5,476M. The difference, $577M of gross profit on $1,175M of revenue, is 49.1%. Both gross margins are GAAP and consolidated, so the comparison is like for like; the fiscal 2027 side is guidance and therefore only as good as C12.
against this
  • Incremental margin is arithmetic on a guide the company has beaten eight quarters running; if revenue lands above the range at an unchanged margin the incremental figure rises mechanically, and at the top of the revenue range with the top of the margin range it is about 55% rather than 49%.
  • A 49% incremental gross margin is still well above the company's cost of capital and is being earned on revenue that carries almost no incremental operating expense - which is why the operating-margin guide rose while the gross-margin guide fell. Gross margin is the wrong line to stop at if the question is whether the extra revenue is worth having; it is the right line if the question is what happens when the pricing reverses.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11

הדוח האחרון (2 בספטמבר)

הרבעון שהסתיים ביולי 2026, לפי הדוחות.

30%
צמיחת המכירות
לעומת הרבעון המקביל אשתקד
4.0%
צמיחה לעומת הרבעון הקודם
לעומת 13.7% ברבעון שלפני כן
24¢
רווח תפעולי
לכל דולר מכירות

הרבעון הראשון של שנת הכספים 2027, שהסתיים ב-31 ביולי, צמח ב-30% ל-2.03 מיליארד דולר, אבל נמשך 14 שבועות לעומת 13. בלי השבוע הנוסף הצמיחה הייתה 26%, ברובה חומרה שנמכרה במחירים עולים: מכירות החומרה עלו ב-51% ואילו שיעור הרווח הגולמי שלה ירד ל-54.6%.

גם השאר מצביע לאותו כיוון. התזרים מפעילות שוטפת ירד ב-25% כי NetApp אגרה רכיבים לקראת העלאות מחירים, ולרבעון הבא התחזית היא להכנסות גבוהות יותר אבל לרווח גולמי נמוך בכ-22 מיליון דולר.

מה זה אומר על התזהזו הראיה העיקרית לעמדה השלילית שלנו. אחרי ניכוי השבוע הנוסף ועליית מחירי שבבי הפלאש כמעט לא נשאר ביקוש יציב, בעוד התזרים ירד והרבעון הבא מבטיח פחות רווח גולמי. אם השנה הזו היא רצפה או שיא יישאר פתוח עד הדוח הבא.

הרבעון בפירוט

צמיחת המכירות לעומת הרבעון הקודם, לפי הדוחות.

רווח למניה $2.58 לעומת $2.12 צפוי; $1.88 לפי הדוחות, והפער הוא הסעיפים שהחברה מנטרלת.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 6 טענות
C08עובדהhigh confidence
Revenue in the quarter ended 31 July 2026 was $2,025 million, up 30% year on year - but the quarter ran 98 days against 91 days a year earlier, fourteen weeks against thirteen.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C09טענת ההנהלהmedium confidence
Management states the additional week contributed approximately $65 million of revenue, 'primarily in support and public cloud', and that revenue grew 26% excluding it - with support growing 4% rather than 11% and public cloud 19% rather than 28%.
against this
  • The $65 million is management's own estimate and no filing discloses it or any basis for it. A simple one-fourteenth of the quarter's revenue would be about $145 million, so the company's figure assumes the extra week added almost nothing to product revenue - defensible, since product revenue is recognised on shipment rather than rateably, but it is an assumption of management's rather than an observation.
  • Applied to support alone the $50 million management attributes is about 7.5% of the $670 million support would otherwise have been, which is close to one-thirteenth and therefore internally consistent. That the arithmetic is consistent does not make it verified: the same arithmetic would be consistent at any product-revenue attribution management chose.
  • Even taking the figure at face value it concedes the direction of the argument rather than resisting it: 30% becomes 26%, support growth becomes 4%, and public cloud growth becomes 19%.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C10עובדהhigh confidence
Product revenue was $987 million in the quarter, up 51%, and rose to 49% of total revenue from 42% a year earlier - while product gross margin fell 150 basis points sequentially to 54.6%, which management attributed to higher component costs partly offset by better pricing.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C16עובדהhigh confidence
In the same quarter that non-GAAP earnings per share rose 66%, NetApp's own tables report net cash from operating activities down 25% to $503 million and free cash flow down 35% to $401 million.
against this
  • The decline is working capital, not earnings. Cash generated before working-capital movements rose from $433M to $497M; the swing is that working capital contributed $240M a year ago and $6M this time. Last year's contribution was itself flattered by a $466M receivables release, against $317M this year.
  • The largest single drain is the $176M inventory build, which management describes as strategic component purchases against known demand and which converts back to cash as the inventory ships. An inventory build ahead of rising input prices is a defensible use of cash rather than a deterioration in earnings quality.
  • Accrued expenses took a further $75M out, of which most is the annual compensation payout - accrued compensation fell from $543M to $390M - which is a timing item that recurs every first quarter.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C17עובדהhigh confidence
Inventories rose from $198 million to $375 million over the quarter, with purchased components going from $14 million to $120 million - a build management describes as strategic component purchases, and which sits alongside NetApp's own risk factor naming NAND as a component whose cost is difficult to manage when prices rise.
current state · 2026-07-31written 2026-09-11
C14אומדןhigh confidence
For the second quarter NetApp guides revenue up about $75 million sequentially at the midpoint and a GAAP gross margin of 66.0-67.0%, which puts guided gross profit about $22 million BELOW the $1,419 million it earned in the first quarter. More revenue, less gross profit.
derivedFirst-quarter GAAP gross profit of $1,419M is filed in the results release (S03). The second-quarter guide is $2.025-2.175bn of revenue at a 66.0-67.0% GAAP gross margin (S03); the midpoints, $2,100M at 66.5%, give $1,396M. $2,100M less the filed $2,025M is +$75M of revenue; $1,396M less $1,419M is -$23M of gross profit. Taking the top of both guided ranges - $2,175M at 67.0% - still gives $1,457M, only $38M above a quarter whose revenue was $150M lower.
against this
  • The sequential comparison flatters the point, because the first quarter had fourteen weeks and the second has thirteen. Per selling week the second quarter's guided revenue is higher, and the gross-profit decline is smaller than the headline arithmetic suggests.
  • Management said the second-half product-margin outlook has improved slightly against the guidance given ninety days earlier, so the direction of revision on this specific line is favourable even though the level is falling.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
לאן הלך הכסף

היא המשיכה לקנות מניות בחזרה, אבל פחות ככל שהמחיר עלה: 200 מיליון דולר קנו 1.5 מיליון מניות ברבעון הזה, לעומת 300 מיליון דולר ל-3.0 מיליון מניות לפני שנה. יש לה כ-1.1 מיליארד דולר יותר מזומן מחוב.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 2 טענות
C28עובדהhigh confidence
Diluted shares were 200 million in the quarter, down 3 million or 1.5% year on year. NetApp spent $200 million repurchasing 1.5 million shares, against $300 million for 3.0 million shares in the same quarter last year, and $950 million for 9.0 million shares across fiscal 2026 - so the buyback bought fewer shares as the price rose.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C29עובדהhigh confidence
NetApp closed the quarter with $3.576 billion of cash and short-term investments against $2.488 billion of total debt - a net cash position of about $1.1 billion - having generated $2,067 million of operating cash flow in fiscal 2026.
current state · 2026-07-31written 2026-09-11
05

המחיר, ואיפה אנחנו חלוקים על השוק

בקצרה. מלא. המחיר משלם על גאות שהתחזית של NetApp עצמה אומרת שהיא דועכת. הוא סביר רק אם מכירות השנה יתבררו כרצפה ולא כשיא.

מחיר המניה
$199.28
שער סגירה,
מכפיל הרווח
27.8
המכפיל המקובל בשש השנים האחרונות: 17.2

המניה עלתה מ-93.69 דולר בינואר ל-209.06 דולר באוגוסט. הקפיצה הגדולה ביותר ביום אחד, 22.4%, באה אחרי תוצאות שבהן ההכנסות צמחו ב-12%: השוק תמחר מחדש את החברה, לא את הרווחים שלה.

המבחן הבא הוא תוצאות רבעון אוקטובר ב-1 בדצמבר: האם שיעור הרווח על החומרה מתאושש, והאם הצמיחה בתמיכה יוצאת מהספרה האחת אחרי שהשבוע הנוסף נעלם.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 3 טענות
C24עובדהhigh confidence
The shares traded at $93.69 in January 2026 and reached $209.06 in August; the single largest step was 29 May 2026, the session after the fiscal 2026 results, when they rose 22.4% - a print in which revenue had grown 12%.
historical · 20 January 2026 to 13 August 2026written 2026-09-11
C10עובדהhigh confidence
Product revenue was $987 million in the quarter, up 51%, and rose to 49% of total revenue from 42% a year earlier - while product gross margin fell 150 basis points sequentially to 54.6%, which management attributed to higher component costs partly offset by better pricing.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C11עובדהhigh confidence
Support revenue grew 4% excluding the extra week, and deferred revenue - the balance the support annuity is billed into - was $4.85 billion, up 7% year on year, against reported revenue growth of 30%.
against this
  • Remaining performance obligations grew 14%, twice the deferred-revenue rate, which is the bull's answer: contracts are being signed faster than they are being billed. It is a real point and it is bounded - the 10-Q says 44% of the $5.6 billion is expected within twelve months, so the twelve-month portion is about $2.5 billion against a guided year of roughly $8.1 billion.
  • Support revenue lags product revenue by construction: an array sold this quarter attaches a support contract that bills over the following years, so a 4% support line is partly a report on what was sold three years ago. If the product surge is durable, support growth should follow it with a lag - which is precisely what the invalidation criterion on support growth is written to catch.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
איך לקרוא את המכפיל

מכפיל של כ-28 על הרווח של השנה שעברה, לעומת המכפיל הרגיל של NetApp, 17. על התחזית לשנה הנוכחית המכפיל הוא כ-27 על הרווח המדווח, או 20 על הרווח ה'מתואם' של החברה, שאינו כולל כ-0.49 דולר למניה של שכר עובדים במניות, עלות אמיתית.

כדי שהמחיר הזה יחזיק, כ-8.1 מיליארד דולר המכירות של השנה צריכים להיות בסיס. אבל התחזית של החברה עצמה למחצית השנייה, התחזית של חברת המחקר IDC ל-2027 והאומדן של האנליסטים לשנת הכספים 2028 מראים כולם האטה לספרה אחת.

מול ההיסטוריה שלה. יקרה בהרבה מהמקובל בהיסטוריה שלה ברווח, במכירות ובמזומנים, דווקא ברגע שבו הצמיחה שלה היא הכי 'שאולה' ממחירי הזיכרון.

הראיות (באנגלית) · 5 טענות
C26הסקהmedium confidence
At $199.28 the price is 20.2 times the midpoint of guided fiscal 2027 non-GAAP earnings and 26.6 times guided GAAP earnings, against a six-year median trailing multiple of 17.2 - so the price requires this year's revenue level to be a base rather than a peak, and requires the multiple to survive the return to mid-single-digit growth that the company's own second half, IDC's 2027 forecast and the sell-side's fiscal 2028 estimate all describe.
derivedThe price and the trailing multiples come from the frozen pack (C25, S14). The guided EPS midpoints are $9.88 non-GAAP and $7.50 GAAP (C12, S03), giving 20.2x and 26.6x at $199.28. The three descriptions of what comes next are the guided second half at about 8.6% (C15), IDC's 2027 forecast of 5.4% for the market (C05), and consensus fiscal 2028 revenue of $8,654M against the fiscal 2027 guidance midpoint of $8,100M, 6.4% (C33). The frame is mid-cycle earnings power rather than peak earnings, which is why the comparison is struck against the company's own multi-year multiple rather than against this year's guided one.
against this
  • Twenty times forward earnings is not a demanding multiple in absolute terms for a company with net cash, a 93%-margin annuity and a first-party position at two hyperscalers. On fiscal 2028 consensus earnings of $11.04 the multiple is 18.1x, which is a price a mid-single-digit grower can carry without the thesis being right about anything.
  • The re-rating may be the market correctly recognising that a decade of 3% growth understated the business, in the same way the six-year median understates it - IDC's own 7.3% compound forecast through 2030 is nearly three times NetApp's realised ten-year rate, so even the outside measurer expects a faster market than the past.
  • The argument is a claim about the durability of a revenue level, and nothing in the file settles it. Management asserts structural improvement in demand; the thesis asserts a price cycle; both are consistent with every filed figure in the quarter.
current state · 2026-09-11written 2026-09-11
C27עובדהhigh confidence
Non-GAAP earnings of $2.58 a share exclude $0.70 of adjustments, of which stock-based compensation of $98 million is about $0.49 - so the multiple the market quotes is struck on a figure that adds back roughly half a dollar a share of a real cost, and the same gap runs through the full-year guide at $9.88 non-GAAP against $7.50 GAAP.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C12טענת ההנהלהhigh confidence
NetApp guides fiscal 2027 revenue to $7.975-8.225 billion with a GAAP gross margin of 67.1-68.1%, against fiscal 2026's $6,925 million at 70.74%. On 28 May 2026 the same year was guided to $7.325-7.575 billion at a 67.5-68.5% gross margin, so the September raise added about $650 million of revenue and took roughly 0.4 points off the gross-margin guide.
against this
  • NetApp has beaten its own revenue and earnings guidance in each of the last eight reported quarters, including by 11% on revenue in this one, so the guide is more likely a floor than a ceiling and the incremental-margin arithmetic struck on it may understate the outcome.
  • The operating-margin guide moved the other way: 22.1-23.1% to 24.3-25.3%, up more than two points, because operating expenses are growing at less than half the revenue rate. A falling gross margin and a rising operating margin are both in this guide, and a reader taking only the first has taken half of it.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
C15אומדןhigh confidence
The fiscal 2027 guidance implies second-half revenue of about $3.98 billion - 3.6% BELOW the first half, against a first half that ran 12.2% below the second half a year earlier - and second-half growth of about 8.6% year on year, against 30% reported in the first quarter and 23% guided for the second.
derivedFirst-quarter revenue of $2,025M is filed (S03); the second-quarter guide midpoint is $2,100M, so the first half is $4,125M. The full-year guide midpoint of $8,100M leaves $3,975M for the second half, which is 3.6% below the first half and, against fiscal 2026's filed second half of $3,661M (Q3 $1,713M plus Q4 $1,948M), 8.6% higher. Fiscal 2026's own second half was 12.2% above its first half of $3,264M. Removing management's $65M extra week from the first half still leaves the guided second half 2.1% below it. At the bottom of the full-year range second-half growth is 5.2% and at the top 12.0%.
against this
  • Four analysts pressed management on exactly this and were told the split is 'roughly 50-50' and 'within spitting distance of our typical seasonality' once the extra week is removed. On the company's own arithmetic the deviation from normal seasonality is smaller than the raw comparison suggests, though it does not disappear: 2.1% below the first half against 12.2% above it last year.
  • NetApp raised the second half at the first opportunity, one quarter into the year, rather than holding it - the CEO said so explicitly. A company that expected the second half to disappoint would more usually leave it alone, and the raise is evidence against reading the deceleration as an admission.
  • The guide has been beaten every quarter for two years, so the implied second-half growth rate is a floor the company sets rather than a forecast it believes.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
C33עובדהmedium confidence
Consensus expects fiscal 2028 revenue of $8,654 million - 6.4% above the fiscal 2027 guidance midpoint - and fiscal 2029 of $9,262 million, so the sell-side models this year's acceleration as a single-year event.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
המכפיל מול המתחרים

רק Everpure מוכרת את אותו הדבר לאותם לקוחות כחלק גדול מהפעילות שלה. גם Dell Technologies וגם Hewlett Packard Enterprise עושות זאת, אבל כחלק קטן מחברות גדולות בהרבה, ולכן המחיר שלהן אומר מעט על NetApp. השוואת מחיר דורשת לפחות שתי חברות, ולכן המחיר נבחן מול ההיסטוריה של NetApp עצמה.

נבדקה גם Nutanix ונדחתה (תחליף, לא אותו מוצר).

מתחרות פרטיות או זרות שאין להן מחיר להשוואה: VAST Data,‏ WEKA,‏ DataDirect Networks (DDN),‏ Huawei,‏ Hitachi Vantara,‏ International Business Machines.

איפה אנחנו חלוקים על השוק

השוק חושב

NetApp הפכה למנצחת בתשתיות AI, וצמיחה של 30% היא שינוי מתמשך ולא מחזור.

אנחנו חושבים

רוב הרבעון נבע משבוע נוסף, מהתייקרות הפלאש ומקנייה מוקדמת; התחזית של החברה עצמה מחזירה את הצמיחה לספרה אחת.

השוק מאמץ את הניסוח של ההנהלה: המנכ״ל מכנה זאת 'שיפור מבני' ו'סימן למחזור-העל של ה-AI'. אבל ספירת השבועות, הרווח הגולמי המצטמצם בתחזית והתחזית של IDC פורסמו כולם, ואף אחד מהם לא מתבטא בשיעור הצמיחה שבכותרת.

הראיות נגדנו אמיתיות. החיובים (billings) צמחו ב-36% וההכנסות החוזיות ב-14%, וההנהלה העלתה את התחזית לשנה בהזדמנות הראשונה במקום לשמור על זהירות.

מה אומרים האנליסטים
הראיות (באנגלית) · 7 טענות
C20טענת ההנהלהlow confidence
The chief executive said certain transactions expected to build out over multiple quarters happened within the first quarter instead, described customers choosing to fit out two of four data centres early, declined to break the effect out, and characterised it as not a material part of the overall business.
against this
  • The two halves of the answer sit awkwardly together: a pull-forward that is immaterial does not need a data-centre example to explain it, and one worth describing at that length is being sized at zero by assertion. Two analysts asked for the magnitude and neither got a number.
  • Management volunteered the existence of accelerated purchasing in the prepared remarks rather than being extracted under questioning, which is the behaviour of a management team disclosing an inconvenient fact rather than hiding one, and is evidence for taking the 'not material' characterisation seriously.
  • The CEO's stated reason is checkable in principle and favourable: he said very few customers have the financial flexibility to pull spending forward, and that those which did also deferred other projects to fund it - which if true makes the net effect on the quarter smaller than the gross pull-forward.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C08עובדהhigh confidence
Revenue in the quarter ended 31 July 2026 was $2,025 million, up 30% year on year - but the quarter ran 98 days against 91 days a year earlier, fourteen weeks against thirteen.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C14אומדןhigh confidence
For the second quarter NetApp guides revenue up about $75 million sequentially at the midpoint and a GAAP gross margin of 66.0-67.0%, which puts guided gross profit about $22 million BELOW the $1,419 million it earned in the first quarter. More revenue, less gross profit.
derivedFirst-quarter GAAP gross profit of $1,419M is filed in the results release (S03). The second-quarter guide is $2.025-2.175bn of revenue at a 66.0-67.0% GAAP gross margin (S03); the midpoints, $2,100M at 66.5%, give $1,396M. $2,100M less the filed $2,025M is +$75M of revenue; $1,396M less $1,419M is -$23M of gross profit. Taking the top of both guided ranges - $2,175M at 67.0% - still gives $1,457M, only $38M above a quarter whose revenue was $150M lower.
against this
  • The sequential comparison flatters the point, because the first quarter had fourteen weeks and the second has thirteen. Per selling week the second quarter's guided revenue is higher, and the gross-profit decline is smaller than the headline arithmetic suggests.
  • Management said the second-half product-margin outlook has improved slightly against the guidance given ninety days earlier, so the direction of revision on this specific line is favourable even though the level is falling.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
C05עובדהmedium confidence
IDC measured the worldwide external OEM enterprise storage market at $9.9 billion in the first calendar quarter of 2026, up 22.9% year on year, against 3.9% growth for full-year 2025; its forecast table puts the market at $35,337M in 2025, $41,089M in 2026 and $43,311M in 2027, a 5.4% increase in that final year, on a 7.3% compound trend through 2030.
current state · 2026-07-01written 2026-09-11
C40אומדןhigh confidence
Billings grew 36% to $2,057 million, ahead of the 30% revenue growth - but billings is revenue plus the movement in deferred revenue, and that movement swung from minus $48 million a year ago to plus $32 million, which is most of the six-point gap. The deferred-revenue balance itself grew 7%.
derivedNetApp defines billings in its own release as net revenues plus the change in total deferred revenue as reported on the cash flow statement (S03). The 10-Q cash flow statement gives that change as +$32M this quarter and -$48M in the prior-year quarter (S02). $2,025M + $32M = $2,057M, and $1,559M - $48M = $1,511M, both matching the release exactly. The $80M swing on a $1,511M base is 5.3 points of the 6.1-point gap between billings growth and revenue growth.
against this
  • A deferred-revenue balance that grows at all while the prior-year quarter drew it down is a real improvement in invoicing, and the 14% growth in remaining performance obligations is a second, independent measure pointing the same way - RPO is not computed from deferred revenue and does not share the arithmetic.
  • Decomposing billings does not make it a bad number; it makes it a number that carries the same information as revenue plus one balance-sheet movement, which is what the metric is defined to be.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C21עובדהhigh confidence
Remaining performance obligations were $5.6 billion at 31 July 2026, of which NetApp expects to recognise 44% within twelve months; the 10-Q states that orders in backlog are cancellable without penalty prior to shipment and are excluded from that figure, so no product backlog stands behind the guided year.
current state · 2026-07-31written 2026-09-11
C12טענת ההנהלהhigh confidence
NetApp guides fiscal 2027 revenue to $7.975-8.225 billion with a GAAP gross margin of 67.1-68.1%, against fiscal 2026's $6,925 million at 70.74%. On 28 May 2026 the same year was guided to $7.325-7.575 billion at a 67.5-68.5% gross margin, so the September raise added about $650 million of revenue and took roughly 0.4 points off the gross-margin guide.
against this
  • NetApp has beaten its own revenue and earnings guidance in each of the last eight reported quarters, including by 11% on revenue in this one, so the guide is more likely a floor than a ceiling and the incremental-margin arithmetic struck on it may understate the outcome.
  • The operating-margin guide moved the other way: 22.1-23.1% to 24.3-25.3%, up more than two points, because operating expenses are growing at less than half the revenue rate. A falling gross margin and a rising operating margin are both in this guide, and a reader taking only the first has taken half of it.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
06

מה יכול להשתבש, ואיך נדע

הסיכונים

  • שיעורי רווח שנלחצים בגלל הזיכרון. NetApp לא מייצרת פלאש ומשלמת את מחיר המחסור: המכירות הנוספות של השנה נושאות שיעור רווח גולמי של כ-49%, לעומת 70.7% בשנה שעברה.
  • קנייה מוקדמת שתשולם בהמשך. לקוחות ציידו מרכזי נתונים מוקדם מהצפוי, והמחצית השנייה צפויה ב-3.6% מתחת לראשונה.
  • שני מפיצים, 43% מהמכירות. הכנסות החומרה נרשמות כשהיא נשלחת אליהם, ולכן רבעון יכול לזוז בגלל מלאי שהם מחזיקים, בלי ששני הצדדים יאמרו זאת.
הראיות (באנגלית) · 4 טענות
C13אומדןmedium confidence
The fiscal 2027 guidance implies an incremental gross margin of about 49% on this year's revenue growth - roughly $577 million of extra gross profit on roughly $1,175 million of extra revenue - against the 70.7% gross margin the whole company earned in fiscal 2026.
derivedFiscal 2026 filed revenue of $6,925M at a filed 70.74% gross margin gives $4,899M of gross profit (C12, S01). The fiscal 2027 guidance midpoints - $8,100M of revenue at a 67.6% GAAP gross margin - give $5,476M. The difference, $577M of gross profit on $1,175M of revenue, is 49.1%. Both gross margins are GAAP and consolidated, so the comparison is like for like; the fiscal 2027 side is guidance and therefore only as good as C12.
against this
  • Incremental margin is arithmetic on a guide the company has beaten eight quarters running; if revenue lands above the range at an unchanged margin the incremental figure rises mechanically, and at the top of the revenue range with the top of the margin range it is about 55% rather than 49%.
  • A 49% incremental gross margin is still well above the company's cost of capital and is being earned on revenue that carries almost no incremental operating expense - which is why the operating-margin guide rose while the gross-margin guide fell. Gross margin is the wrong line to stop at if the question is whether the extra revenue is worth having; it is the right line if the question is what happens when the pricing reverses.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
C20טענת ההנהלהlow confidence
The chief executive said certain transactions expected to build out over multiple quarters happened within the first quarter instead, described customers choosing to fit out two of four data centres early, declined to break the effect out, and characterised it as not a material part of the overall business.
against this
  • The two halves of the answer sit awkwardly together: a pull-forward that is immaterial does not need a data-centre example to explain it, and one worth describing at that length is being sized at zero by assertion. Two analysts asked for the magnitude and neither got a number.
  • Management volunteered the existence of accelerated purchasing in the prepared remarks rather than being extracted under questioning, which is the behaviour of a management team disclosing an inconvenient fact rather than hiding one, and is evidence for taking the 'not material' characterisation seriously.
  • The CEO's stated reason is checkable in principle and favourable: he said very few customers have the financial flexibility to pull spending forward, and that those which did also deferred other projects to fund it - which if true makes the net effect on the quarter smaller than the gross pull-forward.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C15אומדןhigh confidence
The fiscal 2027 guidance implies second-half revenue of about $3.98 billion - 3.6% BELOW the first half, against a first half that ran 12.2% below the second half a year earlier - and second-half growth of about 8.6% year on year, against 30% reported in the first quarter and 23% guided for the second.
derivedFirst-quarter revenue of $2,025M is filed (S03); the second-quarter guide midpoint is $2,100M, so the first half is $4,125M. The full-year guide midpoint of $8,100M leaves $3,975M for the second half, which is 3.6% below the first half and, against fiscal 2026's filed second half of $3,661M (Q3 $1,713M plus Q4 $1,948M), 8.6% higher. Fiscal 2026's own second half was 12.2% above its first half of $3,264M. Removing management's $65M extra week from the first half still leaves the guided second half 2.1% below it. At the bottom of the full-year range second-half growth is 5.2% and at the top 12.0%.
against this
  • Four analysts pressed management on exactly this and were told the split is 'roughly 50-50' and 'within spitting distance of our typical seasonality' once the extra week is removed. On the company's own arithmetic the deviation from normal seasonality is smaller than the raw comparison suggests, though it does not disappear: 2.1% below the first half against 12.2% above it last year.
  • NetApp raised the second half at the first opportunity, one quarter into the year, rather than holding it - the CEO said so explicitly. A company that expected the second half to disappoint would more usually leave it alone, and the raise is evidence against reading the deceleration as an admission.
  • The guide has been beaten every quarter for two years, so the implied second-half growth rate is a floor the company sets rather than a forecast it believes.
forwardwritten 2026-09-11
C18עובדהhigh confidence
Two customers, each of which is a distributor, accounted for 22% and 21% of NetApp's fiscal 2026 net revenues - 43% between them, a share the 10-K states directly in Item 1 and which has been above 40% in each of the last three years.
historical · fiscal 2026, the year ended 24 April 2026written 2026-09-11
שאלות פתוחות
  • כמה מהרבעון היה קנייה מוקדמת של לקוחות. המנכ״ל סירב לכמת זאת.
  • האם שני המפיצים הגדולים אגרו מלאי לפני העלאות מחירים שהוכרזו.
  • כמה מההכנסות של NetApp באמת מונעות מ-AI. ההנהלה אומרת שקשה לכמת ולא נותנת נתון.
הראיות (באנגלית) · 3 טענות
C20טענת ההנהלהlow confidence
The chief executive said certain transactions expected to build out over multiple quarters happened within the first quarter instead, described customers choosing to fit out two of four data centres early, declined to break the effect out, and characterised it as not a material part of the overall business.
against this
  • The two halves of the answer sit awkwardly together: a pull-forward that is immaterial does not need a data-centre example to explain it, and one worth describing at that length is being sized at zero by assertion. Two analysts asked for the magnitude and neither got a number.
  • Management volunteered the existence of accelerated purchasing in the prepared remarks rather than being extracted under questioning, which is the behaviour of a management team disclosing an inconvenient fact rather than hiding one, and is evidence for taking the 'not material' characterisation seriously.
  • The CEO's stated reason is checkable in principle and favourable: he said very few customers have the financial flexibility to pull spending forward, and that those which did also deferred other projects to fund it - which if true makes the net effect on the quarter smaller than the gross pull-forward.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11
C18עובדהhigh confidence
Two customers, each of which is a distributor, accounted for 22% and 21% of NetApp's fiscal 2026 net revenues - 43% between them, a share the 10-K states directly in Item 1 and which has been above 40% in each of the last three years.
historical · fiscal 2026, the year ended 24 April 2026written 2026-09-11
C38טענת ההנהלהlow confidence
NetApp won approximately 350 AI and data-lake modernisation deals in the quarter, which the chief executive said was up significantly from a year earlier; asked what share of revenue is driven by AI, he said it is hard to quantify and gave no figure.
against this
  • An analyst put the prior quarter's count at about 500 and asked for the deal sizes behind the fall; management neither confirmed nor disputed the 500, answered that deal sizes are increasing, and reframed the comparison to year on year. The sequential direction of the count is therefore asserted by an analyst and unrebutted rather than established.
  • A deal count carries no revenue, and management said so itself - the 350 are the AI-stack-specific engagements, while the AI influence on the business is claimed to run much wider through modernisation. Neither number is disclosed, so nothing in the file connects the AI narrative to a revenue line.
historical · Q1 fiscal 2027, the quarter ended 31 July 2026written 2026-09-11

מה ישנה את ההערכה שלנו

  1. לא אטרקטיבית→אטרקטיביתהצמיחה היא של NetApp, במכפיל הרגיל שלה

    נדרשים כל אלה:

    • ○NetApp צומחת מהר יותר מהשוק של IDC שלושה רבעונים ברצף, כשצמיחת התמיכה עוברת 10%, בלי שבועות נוספים, בשניים מהם.ייבדק בדוח הבא, עד 1 בדצמבר
    • ○המניה יורדת למכפיל המקובל בה בשש השנים האחרונות, כ-17.2 על הרווח של השנה שעברה, לעומת 27.8 היום.בחישוב להיום: כ-123.30 דולר, 38% מתחת לשער הסגירה האחרון
  2. פותח מחדש את המחקרהיקף הביקוש המוקדם נמדד

    בתנאי ש:

    • ○NetApp מכמתת כמה מהרבעון היה קנייה מוקדמת, והאם שני המפיצים הגדולים שלה אגרו מלאי לפני העלאות המחירים.ייבדק בדוח הבא, עד 1 בדצמבר
נטעה גם אם
  • שיעור הרווח הגולמי על החומרה חוזר מעל 60% בזמן שההכנסות עדיין צומחות ביותר מ-15%.
  • המחצית השנייה של שנת הכספים 2027 מכניסה יותר מהראשונה, לעומת התחזית היום.

מה בהמשך

  • 1 בדצמבר 2026 תוצאות הרבעון השני של שנת הכספים 2027, הרבעון שמסתיים ב-24 באוקטובר 2026: האם שיעור הרווח הגולמי על המוצרים מתאושש מ-54.6% והאם צמיחת התמיכה יוצאת מהספרה האחת בלי השבוע הנוסף, המבחן הבא שנקבע מראש.
כל האירועים הצפויים
  • 1 בדצמבר 2026 תוצאות הרבעון השני של שנת הכספים 2027, הרבעון שמסתיים ב-24 באוקטובר 2026: האם שיעור הרווח הגולמי על המוצרים מתאושש מ-54.6% והאם צמיחת התמיכה יוצאת מהספרה האחת בלי השבוע הנוסף, המבחן הבא שנקבע מראש.
  • מרץ 2027 תוצאות הרבעון השלישי של שנת הכספים 2027: האם הכנסות המחצית השנייה מגיעות לקרבת התחזית, שנמוכה מזו של המחצית הראשונה, וזו ההאטה שלפי התזה המכפיל מתעלם ממנה.
  • יוני 2027 אג״ח בכירות של 550 מיליון דולר בריבית 2.375% מגיעות לפדיון: האם NetApp פורעת אותן מהמזומנים או ממחזרת בריביות גבוהות יותר, ומה נשאר אז מהמזומן נטו שעליו נשען הציון הפיננסי.
  • יוני 2027 תוצאות שנת הכספים 2027 והתחזית לשנת הכספים 2028: האם השנה מסתיימת בתוך התחזית שהועלתה והאם התחזית הבאה רואה בה בסיס או שיא, מול קונצנזוס גבוה ב-6.4%.
מה קרה מאז
נכתבה
11 בספטמבר
המחיר בעת כתיבת התזה
$199.28
11 בספטמבר
  • 5 באוקטוברבדיקת התזההטיעון בעד ההשקעה מופיע עכשיו מתחת לשורה התחתונהאחרי פיילוט בחמש חברות, הבעלים ביקש להוסיף את הטיעון בעד ההשקעה לכל תזה.
  • 4 באוקטוברבדיקת התזהרשימת הבדיקות של הבעלים: מקורות ההכנסה, עלות הצמיחה, ההנהלה, אירועים צפוייםרשימת הבדיקות של הבעלים הראתה שהשיטה שותקת בשאלות מי מנהל את החברה, כמה עולה הצמיחה, מאיפה מגיע הכסף ואילו אירועים צפויים בתאריכים ידועים. בסבב הזה מילאנו את ארבעת הנושאים מתוך דוח הזימון לאסיפה והדוחות.
  • 29 בספטמברחדשותNetApp הודיעה על רכישה בתחום אחסון ל-AI ועל שירותי שותפים, בלי נתונים. ההערכה לא השתנתההכרזות INSIGHT 2026 והודעה על רכישת PEAK:AIO.
  • 11 בספטמברהתזה נכתבהלא אטרקטיבית, ביטחון בינונירבעון עם צמיחה של 30% שנבע ברובו משבוע נוסף, מהתייקרות זיכרון הפלאש ומקנייה מוקדמת, כשהתחזית של החברה עצמה מאטה את הצמיחה לספרה אחת.

נבדקה גם פעמיים, ללא ממצא חדש שמצריך פעולה.

מקורות 17

Where this came from

Sources - 17

Every claim above cites one of these, or states the reasoning that derived it. The quote is frozen at the date it was read: a link can rot, and an agent fetch returns a reading of a page rather than the page. Backs counts the whole claim ledger, so it can name a claim this page does not surface.

  1. S01primarycompany filing2026-06-05
    the business description of ONTAP and the all-flash, hybrid-flash and cloud portfolios; the Competition section that names no company; the significant-customer table showing two distributors at 22% and 21% of fiscal 2026 net revenues and the Item 1 sentence putting them at 43% together; the fiscal 2017-2026 revenue and margin history; product revenues of $3,194M and services revenues of $3,731M for fiscal 2026 and the note that product revenues benefited from a multi-year enterprise agreement; the geographic split; the risk factor naming NAND among the components whose cost is difficult to manage; the risk factor saying seasonality and linearity may not hold and may be affected by pricing changes; the statement that NetApp typically does not enter into binding long-term purchase commitments; and the concentration-of-risk note saying there are no concentrations of business transacted with a particular market
    backsC01C11C12C17C18C19C22C23C28C29C34C36C43C44C45
  2. S02primarycompany filing2026-09-02
    the balance sheet showing inventories rising from $198M to $375M with purchased components going from $14M to $120M; the cash flow statement with its working-capital components, stock-based compensation of $98M against $83M, and the $176M inventory use; the MD&A explanation of the inventory build as strategic component purchases; the financing note showing $200M spent repurchasing 1.5 million shares against $300M for 3.0 million a year earlier; the remaining-performance-obligation note putting RPO at $5.6 billion, 44% recognisable within twelve months, and stating that orders in backlog are cancellable without penalty prior to shipment and are excluded; and the quarter's 98-day length against the prior year's 91
    backsC08C11C16C17C21C27C28C29C45C46C47
  3. S03primarycompany filing2026-09-02
    revenue of $2,025M up 30%, GAAP gross profit of $1,419M, GAAP EPS of $1.88 and non-GAAP EPS of $2.58; the GAAP table showing operating cash flow down 25% and the non-GAAP table showing free cash flow down 35%; billings of $2,057M up 36%; the second-quarter guidance of $2.025-2.175bn revenue at a 66.0-67.0% GAAP gross margin; and the raised full-year fiscal 2027 guidance of $7.975-8.225bn revenue, 67.1-68.1% GAAP gross margin, $7.35-7.65 GAAP EPS and $9.73-10.03 non-GAAP EPS
    backsC08C12C16C27C32C33
  4. S04primarytranscript2026-09-02
    the CFO's statement that the extra week contributed approximately $65M and that revenue grew 26% excluding it, with $50M of that in support and $15M in public cloud; product revenue of $987M up 51% and 49% of total against 42%; product gross margin of 54.6% down 150 basis points sequentially, support gross margin of 93.2% and public cloud gross margin of 86.4%; support revenue up 4% and public cloud up 19% excluding the week; deferred revenue of $4.85 billion up 7%; net cash of $1.1 billion; the CEO's acknowledgement of accelerated purchase decisions and pricing benefits and his refusal to quantify them; the description of customers moving from all-flash to hybrid flash on price; and, separately from management's answers, the questions themselves - thirteen analysts, of whom four pressed directly on the second-half deceleration, the pull-forward and the product gross-margin trajectory
    backsC03C09C10C11C20C28C29C37C38C39
  5. S05primarycompany filing2026-05-28
    fiscal 2026 revenue of $6.93 billion up 5% and fourth-quarter revenue of $1.95 billion up 12%; and the ORIGINAL fiscal 2027 guidance issued on 28 May 2026 - revenue of $7.325-7.575bn, GAAP gross margin of 67.5-68.5% and non-GAAP EPS of $8.70-9.00 - which is what the September raise is measured against
    backsC12C24
  6. S06primaryindustry data2026-07-01
    the size and growth of the market NetApp sells into, measured by somebody other than NetApp; the attribution of the acceleration to three causes of which two are not AI demand; and the forecast table putting the external OEM market at $35,337M in 2025, $41,089M in 2026 (+16.3%) and $43,311M in 2027 (+5.4%)
    The worldwide external OEM enterprise storage systems (ESS) market delivered a sharp acceleration in the first quarter of 2026, reaching $9.9 billion in spending, a 22.9% year-over-year increase compared to the same quarter of 2025. The result represents an important acceleration from the 3.9% full-year 2025 growth rate and the 5.5% expansion recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025, reflecting the convergence of deferred infrastructure refresh spending, component price inflation, and AI-driven storage demand. ... Component supply constraints, particularly for NAND flash and DRAM, continue to push system-level prices upward, further amplifying revenue growth beyond what shipment volumes alone would suggest. Thus, the market is expected to continue in a positive trajectory of 7.3% compound average growth through 2030. Data - Year | External OEM | External OEM Market Annual Growth % :: 2025 | $35,337 | 4.3% :: 2026 | $41,089 | 16.3% :: 2027 | $43,311 | 5.4%
    backsC05C06C36
  7. S07primaryindustry data2026-08-25
    the size of the input-cost shock running through NetApp's cost of product revenues, measured by a memory-market analyst with no position in storage systems
    Meanwhile, a similar trend is unfolding in NAND Flash, with enterprise SSD prices rising by around 35% in 2H25 and projected to surge by a cumulative 235% in 2026.
    backsC07
  8. S08primaryindustry data2026-03-31
    the quarterly shape of the NAND shock inside NetApp's own first quarter of fiscal 2027, and the statement that NAND capacity is being reallocated to enterprise SSDs
    Overall, NAND Flash contract prices are expected to rise by 70-75% QoQ in 2Q26.
    backsC07
  9. S09primaryother2025-03-18
    the list of storage vendors NVIDIA certifies for AI and high-performance computing workloads - the qualification NetApp's own AI positioning leads with, held by ten vendors including two private AI-native entrants
    DDN, Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Hitachi Vantara, IBM, NetApp, Nutanix, Pure Storage, VAST Data and WEKA
    backsC04
  10. S10primaryother2026-09-11
    confirmation from the cloud provider itself, rather than from NetApp's marketing, that NetApp's operating system is sold as an AWS service
    Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP is a fully managed service that provides highly reliable, scalable, high-performing, and feature-rich file storage built on NetApp's popular ONTAP file system.
    backsC02
  11. S11primaryother2026-09-11
    the second hyperscaler's own description of NetApp's software as a first-party Azure service - the word 'first-party' is Microsoft's, not NetApp's
    Azure NetApp Files is an Azure native, first-party, enterprise-class, high-performance file storage service.
    backsC02
  12. S12primarycompany filing2026-03-25
    the one whole-company listed comparable's own description of the same product sold to the same buyer, and the identity change - the filer that coverage still calls Pure Storage now files as Everpure, Inc. and trades as P on the NYSE
    read, but no claim rests on it
  13. S13primarycompany filing2026-03-16
    the largest storage vendor's own read of the same demand: storage net revenue rose 1% in its fiscal 2026 while AI-optimized servers rose 166%, and storage is one product category inside Infrastructure Solutions Group rather than a reportable segment
    read, but no claim rests on it
  14. S14primaryvendor data2026-09-11
    NTAP research pack, frozen 2026-09-11
    content/NTAP/research-pack.json
    the closing price and market capitalisation; the trailing valuation multiples against their six-year medians; the 252-day price range and return series; the analyst consensus split; FINRA short interest; the insider-filing summary showing 26 open-market sales and no open-market purchases; the earnings-surprise history with filed GAAP EPS beside the adjusted figure; and the filed-competitor cohort's unavailability with its stated reason
    backsC23C24C25C27C30C31C32C33
  15. S15primarycompany filing2026-09-11
    nothing material, which is the finding. Exhibit 3.1 was read in full: it is annual-meeting housekeeping restating the certificate of incorporation, and the authorised share count is unchanged at 885 million common and 5 million preferred. Exhibit 3.2, the restated bylaws, was not read. Cited so that the only filing in the window the thesis does not rely on is on the record as having been opened rather than missed
    read, but no claim rests on it
  16. S16primarycompany filing2026-07-28
    beneficial ownership as of July 13, 2026; the fiscal 2026 annual incentive plan's metrics, weights and payouts; the PBRSU design (relative TSR and billings) and the fiscal 2024 award's 91.76% payout; the CEO's PBRSU/RSU mix
    backsC41C42
  17. S17primarycompany filing2023-06-14
    the fiscal 2021 to 2023 income statements: research and development, sales and marketing, general and administrative and revenue, the base years of the cost-per-sales-dollar series
    backsC44C45
נבנה מתוך content/NTAP/thesis.json · התזה נבדקה לאחרונה ב-11 בספטמבר 2026. העמוד מסביר את החברה; הוא לא אומר כמה לשלם, מתי לקנות או באיזה היקף. התרגום לעברית נעשה בבינה מלאכותית, והנוסח האנגלי הוא הקובע.